Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie
View Post
Teachers: Are Gove and Cameron listening?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by subcontrabass View PostWhere are the instruments and teachers to come from to implement the music bit in the proposed national curriculum? All pupils are to learn to sing, to perform using voices and instruments, and to read and use staff notation (amongst other things). Hmmm. See https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nt_-_FINAL.pdf (starting on page 216) for details.
Are you planning to stick around for the Proms plus the odd dalliance over on AA? :erm::biggrin:
Comment
-
Originally posted by subcontrabass View PostWhere are the instruments and teachers to come from to implement the music bit in the proposed national curriculum? All pupils are to learn to sing, to perform using voices and instruments, and to read and use staff notation (amongst other things). Hmmm. See https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nt_-_FINAL.pdf (starting on page 216) for details.
In schools the man is almost universally regarded as a joke, albeit an extremely sick one.
Comment
-
-
Notice also the inconsistency between the History and Geography requirements.
Key Stage 2 Geography deals only with Europe and North and South America.
The tiny non-British part of Key Stage 2 History requires study of "the achievements of the earliest civilizations - an overview of where and when the first civilizations appeared and a depth study of one of the following: Ancient Sumer; The Indus Valley; Ancient Egypt; The Shang Dynasty of Ancient China". How can you study any of those without some awareness of the relevant geography?
Comment
-
-
An_Inspector_Calls
It seems there's complete agreement here that Gove is incompetent. The teaching unions seem to think the same. And part of the message seems to be that they'd all rather go back to creative learning rather than learning by rote.
That would all be fine, if the product delivered by the teaching profession compared well with that produced by other countries and in comparison with the past. But we know we're slipping down the Pisa testing scale conducted by the OECD. And from personal experience of maths and science recruiting and a university industrial liaison panel, things are getting worse. A simple, particular example. You see first year engineering students who cannot handle percentage calculations. First year students are so weak with calculus, differential equations, and the like, there's now a need for a degree preparation year, making many courses four year rather than three. (The course is dressed up as a Masters Degree, but it covers no more than that covered in earlier three year courses). Cambridge is now offering additional teaching to A-level physics students because the present curricula lacks the rigour of the pre 1980 syllabus (see article by Mark Warner, Sunday Times 12/5/13).
Perhaps some here with experience of science teaching to A-level can explain what's going wrong and what Gove is missing - rather than repeating the mantra that Gove is an idiot? Perhaps on the way they can explain what creative learning means in terms of science teaching, because it escapes me. It may be that demonstrating proof by induction is termed creative these days - I don't know.
Comment
Comment