Leveson Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lateralthinking1

    #16
    The Leveson Inquiry will cost taxpayers £6 million at a time of economic crisis.

    Given the Prime Minister's statement today, is it the most expensive bit of old window dressing in history?

    Comment

    • Stunsworth
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 1553

      #17
      Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View Post
      Given the Prime Minister's statement today, is it the most expensive bit of old window dressing in history?
      Well he doesn't want to upset Mr Murdoch, he's got an election he wants to try and win in a couple of years/
      Steve

      Comment

      • Serial_Apologist
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 37715

        #18
        Originally posted by Stunsworth View Post
        Well he doesn't want to upset Mr Murdoch, he's got an election he wants to try and win in a couple of years/
        Is there a link to what Cameron announced? I can't bear to wait to hear... :whistle:

        Comment

        • subcontrabass
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 2780

          #19
          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
          Is there a link to what Cameron announced? I can't bear to wait to hear... :whistle:
          This is Cameron's statement: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/davi...nquiry-report/

          Comment

          • ahinton
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 16123

            #20
            Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View Post
            The Leveson Inquiry will cost taxpayers £6 million at a time of economic crisis.

            Given the Prime Minister's statement today, is it the most expensive bit of old window dressing in history?
            Almost everything costs something regardless of whether or not that cost arises "at a time of economic crisis" such as the one that we're all in together(?!) now; frankly, I'm astonished at the cost of this, though, because not only had I expected it to have gone on much longer and have a far wider remit, its apparent £6m price tag for what we did get from it (including a report whose page count alone is little short of the equivalent of three volumes of the OED) seems to me almost to border on the bargain basement end of such things, actually; the overall cost of its ongoing outcome, whatever it may or many not turn out to be, will surely dwarf this figure.

            Comment

            • Flosshilde
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7988

              #21
              Originally posted by subcontrabass View Post
              Flannel. The most definite part of it was where he says that Leveson found no evidence of collusion between the govt & News International.

              It all adds up to - 'We're going to do as little as possible.'


              Has Clegg beed allowed to make his own statement, as he wanted to?

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37715

                #22
                Originally posted by subcontrabass View Post
                Many thanks, scb!

                Comment

                • subcontrabass
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 2780

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post

                  Has Clegg been allowed to make his own statement, as he wanted to?
                  You can find his statement here.

                  Comment

                  • Simon

                    #24
                    No specific interest for me as such, all this - but I felt it somewhat surreal to hear a Conservative arguing against legislation against the press, and a Labour and, for heaven's sake, a Liberal politician arguing for press restriction!

                    Comment

                    • Bumfluff
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 30

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Simon View Post
                      No specific interest for me as such, all this - but I felt it somewhat surreal to hear a Conservative arguing against legislation against the press, and a Labour and, for heaven's sake, a Liberal politician arguing for press restriction!
                      It's not surreal at all. Conservatives are always against regulation for private commercial bodies and their freedoms.
                      The latter then donate to the Tories/New Labour and continue to get preferential treatment. And the cycle of life goes on.

                      Comment

                      • Flosshilde
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7988

                        #26
                        Originally posted by subcontrabass View Post
                        You can find his statement here.
                        Thanks - much better than Cameron's crocodile tears about the victims, & self-serving, self-congratulatory, triumphalism.

                        Comment

                        • Extended Play

                          #27
                          From what I've read and heard so far -- and it's early days -- Lord Justice Leveson's main recommendation seems to be a fudge, or to put it more charitably, an elegantly crafted balancing act. The press is told to go away away and devise a tougher system of self-regulation with sticks and carrots, and the government is told to underpin this system by legislation. This is no doubt a hugely over-simplistic analysis; but even so, who would actually be calling the shots here? Don't you have to come down either on the side of self-regulation, or legislation?

                          Perhaps inevitably the phrase "last-chance saloon" has been invoked today. It's twenty years since David Mellor used it as a warning to the "popular press". Is anything really going to change now? I'd love to be proved wrong, but I'm not optimistic.

                          Comment

                          • David-G
                            Full Member
                            • Mar 2012
                            • 1216

                            #28
                            I may be very old fashioned, but I think this sort of language demeans the forum.

                            Comment

                            • Flosshilde
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7988

                              #29
                              Still, at least Nigel Farage thinks he's "grown up and sensible" (or he says he does :erm:)

                              Comment

                              • David-G
                                Full Member
                                • Mar 2012
                                • 1216

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Simon View Post
                                No specific interest for me as such, all this - but I felt it somewhat surreal to hear a Conservative arguing against legislation against the press, and a Labour and, for heaven's sake, a Liberal politician arguing for press restriction!
                                I am indeed astonished that Clegg appears to be against freedom of the Press. It's a freedom which it would be dangerous to lose.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X