Originally posted by Lateralthinking1
View Post
Originally posted by Lateralthinking1
View Post
Whether the régime recommended as one of the outcomes of such an inquiry is rejected in whole or in part emains to be seen but, leaving that aside for a moment, what would you have done rather than have such an inquiry which, as you rightly note, is paid for by the taxpayer just as is anything else on which the government spends the money that it doesn't otherwise have? Do you think that it was all a waste of money or only if its recommendations are not taken up? And what if the recommendations are taken up but, in the end, don't actually improve matters that need improving or continue to allow - or at least not to prevent - further instances of victimisation by the media regardless of the punishments that can be dispensed for it when and where it can be proved to have occurred?
We are all talking as if press freedom is the key question and money doesn't come into it.[/QUOTE]
Comment