Originally posted by amateur51
View Post
Murdoch: Ouf! Is this meltdown?
Collapse
X
-
scottycelt
-
amateur51
Former News of the World editor Andy Coulson was paid by the paper's parent company while working as the Tories' spokesman, the BBC has learned. News International paid the Conservatives' former communications director a severance package worth several hundred thousand pounds. Mr Coulson, who has been arrested on suspicion of phone hacking, also had continued access to healthcare
Former News of the World editor Andy Coulson was paid by his paper's parent company while working as the Tories' spokesman, the BBC learns.
It appears that Mr Coulson was hired by the then opposition Conservative party in July 2007 for a reported salary of £275,000.:yikes:
And they have the nerve to moan about certain 'excessive' Local Authority salaries :doh:
This one is running .. and running ..and :ok::smiley:
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostFormer News of the World editor Andy Coulson was paid by the paper's parent company while working as the Tories' spokesman, the BBC has learned. News International paid the Conservatives' former communications director a severance package worth several hundred thousand pounds. Mr Coulson, who has been arrested on suspicion of phone hacking, also had continued access to healthcare
Former News of the World editor Andy Coulson was paid by his paper's parent company while working as the Tories' spokesman, the BBC learns.
It appears that Mr Coulson was hired by the then opposition Conservative party in July 2007 for a reported salary of £275,000.:yikes:
And they have the nerve to moan about certain 'excessive' Local Authority salaries :doh:
This one is running .. and running ..and :ok::smiley:
Comment
-
-
amateur51
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostIt appears that Mr Coulson was hired by the then opposition Conservative party in July 2007 for a reported salary of £275,000.:yikes:It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostOriginally Posted by Simon
Indeed Mr P.
Single-issue comments from single-track minds.
As to Mr Pee's predictable response (why are so many of his responses predictable?), there are plenty of other topics here in which no one necessarily quotes from any journal at all and, in any case, not all journal quotes in this and similar threads have been from the Guardian. For anyone to be a "usual suspect" there has first to be someone to do the suspecting and something that the "suspect" has done that might reasonably arouse "suspicion"; the use of that term is thus at best unhelpful in the present context and certainly adds nothing useful to the discussion.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostOne has to assume that Simon & Mr P approve of the extensive hacking by journalists on the NotW, & the power RM has wielded over politicians?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostIf I'm not mistaken, French Frank is being ironic :biggrin:It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostIt is, of course, wholly uncharacteristic of myself to be at all picky and precise, but don't you actually mean 'dagnabbit', amateur ... ? :winkeye:
I understand the same is true of "dagnabbit" and "dabnabbit" - both usages are reported. .:rose: . :peacedove:
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Vinteuil, I have been, therefore, most badly advised by my leading search engine and therefore apologise to Amateur51, quite unreservedly ...
However, I must point out that, neoclassical critics notwithstanding, the views of both grammarians and Jesuit priests have never been known to particularly excite the imagination of, or exert any influence whatsoever on some of the more active members of this Forum. :winkeye:
Nevertheless, it would be churlish of myself not to thank you profusely for your otherwise most helpful and corrective contribution. :ok:
Comment
-
amateur51
I confess that you were correct with your initial post, scotty - I had intended to to trype dagnabbit (in homage to the great Deputy Dawg, of course) but, suffering as I do from Phat Phinger Syndrome, I mis-typed (thank you Secretary Clinton! :smiley:).
However, I am also grateful to vinteuil for the news that dab or dag , both are valid - -YAY! :laugh:
Comment
-
amateur51
In a move designed to capitalise on the embarrassment the phone-hacking scandal has heaped on the government, Labour said there was still a possibility that Rupert Murdoch could reopen his bid and the law should be changed to allow ministers to block it. Ivan Lewis, the shadow culture secretary, will introduce a negative motion when parliament returns next week, which – if approved by all parties – could go ahead without a vote.
Comment
Comment