General election results 2015

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Originally posted by Anastasius View Post
    Sad to see the scum from the anarchist-left can't accept the result of a democratic election. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32678518 Perhaps we could give them a one-way ticket to ISIS ?
    Surely you mean a subscription?

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20570

      Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
      Surely you mean a subscription?

      http://isismagazine.org.uk
      I thought it meant an Egyptian god.

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
        I thought it meant an Egyptian god.
        Or a posh river?

        Can you be both an "anarchist" and "left" ?
        surely anarchism is a rejection of that paradigm?

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30259

          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
          Nicola Sturgeon is ex-Labour, but the trend evolved over a period of 20 years or so.
          That was my feeling. I never thought of Salmond as anything but rather right-wing.

          It's become a, in my view, glib mantra to say that right and left 'no longer applies', since it was only ever a figurative meaning anyway, a shorthand.

          But if you don't perceive any distinct differences between the general way Tories rule the country and the way other parties would, let's just accept the election result as one that is irrelevant to all our lives and stop making a fuss. It really doesn't matter who wins. If there are perceptible differences, we can convey that by talking of left and right. Or blue and red. Or good and evil.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20570

            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            It's become a, in my view, glib mantra to say that right and left 'no longer applies', since it was only ever a figurative meaning anyway, a shorthand.

            But if you don't perceive any distinct differences between the general way Tories rule the country and the way other parties would, let's just accept the election result as one that is irrelevant to all our lives and stop making a fuss. It really doesn't matter who wins. If there are perceptible differences, we can convey that by talking of left and right. Or blue and red. Or good and evil.
            I think it's become fuzzier by the tendency of political parties to move further to the right. We saw that with New Labour, which even made some Conservatives squeal. And then with the Lib Dems, when they moved towards being a tax-cutting party. The problem with "moderation" of this kind is that the parties of the right move further to the right.

            So society becomes more selfish.

            Comment

            • jean
              Late member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7100

              And here come Mandelson and Blair, telling us that Labour lost because they'd moved too far to the left...

              Can't say I'd noticed.

              One of the worst problems for any sort of progressive politics is the unquestioned acceptance that austerity is the only possible apporoach. And if you accept that, then clearly the Tories are best at austerity. No wonder they won.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20570

                Austerity only seems to apply to the less well off.

                Comment

                • eighthobstruction
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 6433

                  Originally posted by jean View Post

                  One of the worst problems for any sort of progressive politics is the unquestioned acceptance that austerity is the only possible apporoach. And if you accept that, then clearly the Tories are best at austerity. No wonder they won.
                  ....Yes job done....3 million orange jump suits on order....
                  bong ching

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37641

                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    Or a posh river?

                    Can you be both an "anarchist" and "left" ?
                    surely anarchism is a rejection of that paradigm?
                    Well in the good ole days both anarchists and socialists were aiming to bring about socialism: the differences were that anarchists thought this could come about by changes in people's heads leading to ditto in their relationships and thence by accretion aided by selective terrorist acts to the eventual transformation, governments being an irrelevancy or at best in the way and inclined to impose power which = repression; whereas socialists thought it required government of a new kind with grass-roots back up from the real wealth creators, as opposed the capitalists employing them, and could only take place either through changing or replacing the state apparatus.

                    ABC of politics. But you knew that really, GG, I believe.

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30259

                      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                      Austerity only seems to apply to the less well off.
                      That's axiomatic. The less well-off are the ones who cost public money: the better off can buy themselves out of it.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • James Wonnacott
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 248

                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        I think it's become fuzzier by the tendency of political parties to move further to the right. We saw that with New Labour, which even made some Conservatives squeal. And then with the Lib Dems, when they moved towards being a tax-cutting party. The problem with "moderation" of this kind is that the parties of the right move further to the right.

                        So society becomes more selfish.
                        Odd, in my view they've all moved to the left.
                        I have a medical condition- I am fool intolerant.

                        Comment

                        • jean
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7100

                          If only...

                          Comment

                          • MrGongGong
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 18357

                            Originally posted by jean View Post
                            If only...
                            Going on mrW's previous pronouncements I think Genghis Khan is a bit too leftie for him!

                            Comment

                            • Serial_Apologist
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 37641

                              I've just checked:

                              Helen Hayes, our Labour candidate, got elected in this constituency on 54% of the vote.
                              Resham Kotecha, Conservative, came second, on 23%
                              LibDems and Greens got 10% and 9% respectively.

                              I was impressed with Ms Hayes the moment I met her canvassing on my doorstep: we spent 10 minutes talking about the party's problems, and mainly on the strength of an 88 vote difference between her well-known predecessor (Tessa Jowell) and the Tories in 2010, I decided to switch from the Greens.

                              If such a result can be attained in a leafy, middle-class aspirant district such as this, with good sympathetic candidates rather than party machine merchants standing it should have been achievable anywhere.

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12801

                                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                                I've just checked:

                                Helen Hayes, our Labour candidate, got elected in this constituency on 54% of the vote.
                                Resham Kotecha, Conservative, came second, on 23%
                                LibDems and Greens got 10% and 9% respectively.

                                I was impressed with Ms Hayes the moment I met her canvassing on my doorstep: we spent 10 minutes talking about the party's problems, and mainly on the strength of an 88 vote difference between her well-known predecessor (Tessa Jowell) and the Tories in 2010, I decided to switch from the Greens.

                                If such a result can be attained in a leafy, middle-class aspirant district such as this, with good sympathetic candidates rather than party machine merchants standing it should have been achievable anywhere.
                                ... and I've just checked here:

                                Andy Slaughter, our Labour candidate, got elected on 50% share of the total vote (+6.1% change in share of the votes)
                                Charlie Dewhirst, Conservative, came second with 36%

                                Lib Dems and Greens got 4.6% and 4.4% respectively.

                                Not particularly leafy here, but certainly includes 'middle class aspirant' - and a good sympathetic candidate...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X