Originally posted by MrGongGong
View Post
State of the parties as 2015 General Election looms.
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostI seem to recall that research showed that the amount paid illegitimately to people claiming welfare benefits was dwarfed by the sums owed to the Treasury by tax fiddlers and avoiders and other forms of cheating.
You'll doubtless want evidence of this, so I'll go a-hunting
That's a bit like saying that the tax collected from old grannies is much less than that taken from billionaires, therefore the State should only care about the billionaires and not old grannies.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostLarge parts of Devon, Cornwall for a start.
Fake and dull
Can I have my railway back please?
Devon and Cornwall? Anyway, this is the royal family, they have to own some land. How would they look when they meet other royal families, if they lived in a council estate?
And remember, as you have commented, the top 2 democracies in the world, and 3 out of the top 5 are constitutional monarchies. So if you and RB really want all the benefits of the Scandinavians, you're gonna have to ditch your republican stance.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostNobody has said that all those on 'benefits' are 'scroungers', the great majority will no doubt be perfectly genuine.
Are you telling us that there are NO 'scroungers' on 'benefits' or that, if there are, they shouldn't be rooted out and charged with fraud against the taxpayer... ?
'Scroungers' are just cheats after all ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostWe ALL owned it (along with lots of other things) but they were stolen by an evil witch
I agree with you that the railroads should have never left state-ownership. Cheap transport is vital to helping people get a better stake-hold in life (your earlier link makes the point very well) and the only way to do that is to have it state-owned.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWell, here I would agree with you. Yes, of course there are some scroungers on benefits, just as there are very rich scroungers but, as you suggest, these are in the minority. Scroungers are cheats, as you say - and don't let's kid ourselves that there are no wealthy cheats!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostAs I have said before, if any rich people have stolen from poor people, they should be prosecuted and any property returned to the rightful owners.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostExcellent idea, I used to own part of the railway and it was stolen and given away to spivs.
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI'm looking forward to seeing this in the Kipper manifesto (though it might upset those who are keen on the "Windsors")
All that said, it won't matter because there won't be a UKIP government; Mr Garage himself openly admits that.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWell, here I would agree with you. Yes, of course there are some scroungers on benefits, just as there are very rich scroungers but, as you suggest, these are in the minority. Scroungers are cheats, as you say - and don't let's kid ourselves that there are no wealthy cheats!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostYou have indeed said it before and, insofar as it goes, it is undoubtedly a laudable statement, but if every example of such theft were to be thoroughly investigated at all levels and due redress and remedy made (assuming that it could be taken back from the thieves themselves, which is quite a big ask), I suspect that you would become less well disposed towards the exercise in practice. Moreover, how far back in history would you advocate going in putting all this to rights?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostAnyway, this is the royal family, they have to own some land. How would they look when they meet other royal families, if they lived in a council estate?
Comment
-
Comment