Government reshuffle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mercia
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 8920

    Government reshuffle

    the Gove has shuffled

    Michael Gove's new job is not a demotion, says No 10, as David Cameron unveils his biggest reshuffle, including more top jobs for women.
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30324

    #2
    Originally posted by mercia View Post
    the Gove has shuffled
    Chief Whip. Perhaps not much damage to be done there?

    "Mr Cameron said on his Twitter feed that the former education secretary would have "an enhanced role in campaigning and doing broadcast media interviews". That sounds like a good move :-)
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • amateur51

      #3
      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      Chief Whip. Perhaps not much damage to be done there?

      "Mr Cameron said on his Twitter feed that the former education secretary would have "an enhanced role in campaigning and doing broadcast media interviews". That sounds like a good move :-)
      Good move indeed - who's taking over from Paxo on Newsnight?

      Comment

      • Eine Alpensinfonie
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 20570

        #4
        Cameron's finest move.
        (I want to insert a big grin emoticon.)

        :-D

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 37704

          #5
          Lots of surprises - of which the removal of possibly the most evolved thinking leading Tory William Haig was the most astonishing. I had had the impression for quite some time that his having continually to present glosses on the various intractable international political situations in which he was involved in negotating had been starting to get to him.

          The removal of the thick-skinned (some might say just thick) Messrs Owen Patterson (Maladminister for Floods) and Philip Hammond will have been welcomed by embarrassed Tory supporters. I'm not surprised Esther McVey stays at Employment - possibly the first-ever unapologetic Scouse apologist for the government's post-Thatcherist attitudes to the unemployed and employed, though for some reason her role has been reduced, for reasons I don't yet understand.

          All-in-all a night of long knives that installs an inexperienced Cabinet to fight next year's general Election.
          Last edited by Serial_Apologist; 15-07-14, 12:00. Reason: to bring in line with subject's new thread

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30324

            #7
            Nick Robinson on The Departure of Gove (sounds like a P.G. Wodehouse story).
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • P. G. Tipps
              Full Member
              • Jun 2014
              • 2978

              #8
              Though this whole ridiculous farce is enough to make grown (middle-aged) men weep, the following press clip had me howling with laughter:

              <The PM's office has tweeted:

              “Nick Boles is Minister of State for the Business and Education depts. Part of his brief will be equal marriage implementation'' (my italics)

              Mr Boles has not yet commented on his new appointment.>

              Comment

              • ahinton
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 16123

                #9
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                Lots of surprises - of which the removal of possibly the most evolved thinking leading Tory William Haig was the most astonishing. I had had the impression for quite some time that his having continually to present glosses on the various intractable international political situations in which he was involved in negotating had been starting to get to him.
                Hague, actually! You may be right in what you write in your second sentence and, after all, it does appear to have been a case of did he go rather than was he pushed - i.e. his decision rather than Cameron's.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  #10
                  Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                  Cameron's finest move.
                  (I want to insert a big grin emoticon.)

                  :-D
                  :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

                  It's a start
                  NOW how about the Labour party saying they will reverse the who free school nonsense ?

                  Comment

                  • jean
                    Late member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 7100

                    #11
                    They could promise to reverse the whole Academy nonsense too (except they can't, because they started it.)

                    Comment

                    • Dave2002
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 18025

                      #12
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      Chief Whip. Perhaps not much damage to be done there?

                      "Mr Cameron said on his Twitter feed that the former education secretary would have "an enhanced role in campaigning and doing broadcast media interviews". That sounds like a good move :-)
                      Some of us might appreciate some damage in his new area of responsibility. Good move!

                      Comment

                      • MrGongGong
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 18357

                        #13
                        Originally posted by jean View Post
                        They could promise to reverse the whole Academy nonsense too (except they can't, because they started it.)
                        Indeed
                        But i'm not holding my breath
                        More of the same nonsense is what we will get in education regardless of which group of f*ckwits are in charge :-(

                        Comment

                        • Dave2002
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 18025

                          #14
                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          They could promise to reverse the whole Academy nonsense too (except they can't, because they started it.)
                          The formation of Academies can have some other side effects, such as the possible (unwanted?) transfer of land and other assets from public ownership to private bodies. This is very undesirable (IMO) and developers have certainly noticed this.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #15
                            Originally posted by jean View Post

                            Chris Keates, general secretary of the NASUWT teaching union, has said that the departure of Michael Gove will not benefit the teaching profession unless it is accompanied by a change of policy. Here's his statement.
                            "He" is a "she".

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X