Originally posted by jean
View Post
Scotland to charge for plastic bags
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI am aware of the figures that have been reported for this but, given the example that I provided above, I wonder to what extent these could be trusted in all instances...
My sister who lives in Wales tells me the reduction in the amount of plastic bag litter is noticable...but she's probably lying.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostWe're all hoodwinked from time to time by government propaganda or government prioritising certain issues to divert attention from others, so I think it's a bit unfair to single teamsaint out by expecting him to produce evidence of this being the case: how could that be gathered: vox populi, referenda asking when you last felt hoodwinked or went along with a policy, and do you feel stupid for being duped?? Some will think the government is solving environmental degradation by putting charges on plastic carrier bags, but this is a miniscule part of the rest of the problem, which is only being discussed in repetitive ways at most while fracking gets the presumptive thumbs up as ostensibly a pro tem solution which as we all know will become accepted practice once in. However I am glad to learn from this thread that some plastic carriers are biodegradable - because what else does on bag up ones unrecyclable rubbish in? - while waiting for evidence (hmm) that said biodegradability does not of itself cause pollution.
I don't think there is such a thing as an undistorted market: some can pay more than others, thereby determining prices, and that is where profit is "realised". Were poorer people to be subsidised to keep them spending, that might arguably be described as a market distortion because it would be paid for by taxes on other's incomes or profits, but the thing is that poorer person paying for some product out of a subsidised income would keep someone else in a job. In Taiwan, perhaps. So, what does one really mean, by "market distortion"?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostWhat a suspicious lot you are on this thread!
My sister who lives in Wales tells me the reduction in the amount of plastic bag litter is noticable...but she's probably lying.
Comment
-
-
Anna
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostNot quite sure why UKIP came into this !!!
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI wonder to what extent these could be trusted in all instances. Furthermore, to what extent should Waitrose's 5p per £13.86 worth of shopping be relied upon as complying fully with Welsh regulations on this? - or perhaps one should instead ask why the Welsh Assembly let them get away with their own interpretation of it .
Comment
-
Your first objection to this measure was this:
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostThis measure doesnt even make sense within its own retail arena, where there is untold waste and polluting material everywhere.
But now you're talking about market distortion instead. Are you sure that there are no market-distorting implications to the untold waste and polluting material?
Comment
-
-
The somewhat throwaway comment about market distortions really wasn't that important.
I couldn't say about distortions in the packaging market. Perhaps you can enlighten us?
Perhaps it would be more use if we concentrated our discussion around the vast amount of waste that you refer to, of which plastic bags account for a quarter of 1 per cent.Last edited by teamsaint; 30-05-14, 17:57.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anna View PostBecause UKIP, in their 2014 local election manifesto said they would ignore the EU Landfill/Waste Directive, restore weekly bin collections and send it all to landfill thereby ensuring lower Council Tax for one and all. Although, I don't think they hold the balance of power on any Councils but they are intending to undo all the good work that has been done before (the fact that they are totally deluded doesn't mean they are not a real threat)
Oh Dear, don't obscure matters! All online retailers in Wales have to charge something for bagged delivery, the amount varies. Asda charge 35p however much you spend (or however little, the minimum spend of £25 still means 35p in bag levy) It complicates matters too much to count each bag per delivery, but please write to the Welsh Assembly if it worries you. :-)
That said, as I mentioned, there are ways around this rule and, whilst I can applaud it in principle, the material difference that it might make in the overall environmental picture is a very small one but, in any case, the French seem to have a better and more efficient way of addressing it by simply not providing plastic carrier bags at all but instead providing free of charge the kinds of "bag for life" that are of better quality than most that are sold here for small sums - I have several of these and they've lasted very well.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIt doesn't. I don't live in Wales anyway (well, not as it is currently constituted, anyway, although you will doubtless argue that, historically, I do!) and I wouldn't write to them anyway as I can't write in Welsh!
The answer to the bag problem is surely not to provide them at all. Tesco sells canvas shopping bags that that last for years.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe answer to the bag problem is surely not to provide them at all. Tesco sells canvas shopping bags that that last for years.
Environmentalism among the general public doesn't go very deep. They don't want to be seriously inconvenienced. I doubt you can get away with much more than 5p for a carrier bag without there being a major protest. Instead of a bedroom tax, how about taxing spare seats in cars - for every journey?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostMost supermarkets sell 'Bags for Life'. But not providing plastic bags means people 'have' to buy more expensive bags, as they will come out without a bag whether they have one at home or not. That's why the shops have the giveaway bags in the first place.
Environmentalism among the general public doesn't go very deep. They don't want to be seriously inconvenienced. I doubt you can get away with much more than 5p for a carrier bag without there being a major protest. Instead of a bedroom tax, how about taxing spare seats in cars - for every journey?
My local sports car dealer thinks this is a great idea too. Boyracersmileything.
I wonder what would make environmentalism among the public go deeper, if that is the problem?
Perhaps they are already fed up of much of the inconvenience of modern life that is imposed by big corporations, and take their lead from them ?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostInstead of a bedroom tax, how about taxing spare seats in cars - for every journey?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostInstead of a bedroom tax, how about taxing spare seats in cars - for every journey?
Hang on a moment
that would mean that someone in a Ferrari would pay less than me going to a gig with a car full of gear in a 13 year old volvo ?
Comment
-
-
I am working on a formula which takes into consideration: age of car, petrol consumption and performance, no of available seats, size of engine, availability of local public transport, seat covering, tinted glass ... :-)It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment