It is in the long run much more important to cure aggressiveness, a much more widespread, real and pernicious disorder. I would hope to see a subsequent programme entitled "Cure me, I'm agressive."
Diverted by request
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostIt is in the long run much more important to cure aggressiveness, a much more widespread, real and pernicious disorder. I would hope to see a subsequent programme entitled "Cure me, I'm agressive."
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostNow let me see, there's a certain rude man who likes to appear on TV with his fantasy politics who could do with a lot less rudeness and a lot less aggression........
You are obsessed with Nigel Farage, but turn a blind eye to politicians and parties that facilitate paedophiles!!!
Ok, what do want to discuss about the UKIP next?
How about the policy to take the lowest waged earners out of tax altogether?
No, hang on, that would mean trusting people to do things like spend the money on school dinners an' all. Can't have the population acting on their own account outside of state-control, can we, eh?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostIt is in the long run much more important to cure aggressiveness, a much more widespread, real and pernicious disorder. I would hope to see a subsequent programme entitled "Cure me, I'm agressive."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostYou want to talk about the UKIP again!
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostYou are obsessed with Nigel Farage, but turn a blind eye to politicians and parties that facilitate paedophiles!!!
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostOk, what do want to discuss about the UKIP next?
How about the policy to take the lowest waged earners out of tax altogether?
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostNo, hang on, that would mean trusting people to do things like spend the money on school dinners an' all. Can't have the population acting on their own account outside of state-control, can we, eh?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostAnd you don't, of course!...
You can be no more certain of either of these things than you can that he was actually referring to Mr Farage alone; after all, he could as easily have been referring to any of the current party leaders.
Oh, you mean like the LibDems say that they do and their current coalition partners are being coerced into thinking about doing?
Maybe, maybe not but, since the state can't entirely control all of them anyway, the question might arguably be seen as somewhat academic...
You are obsessed with Nigel Farage, but turn a blind eye to politicians and parties that facilitate paedophiles!!!
Ok, what do want to discuss about the UKIP next?
How about the policy to take the lowest waged earners out of tax altogether that the UKIP had mrs than a year before Clegg decided to nick it, because he doesn't understand how to properly help poor people?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostYou want to talk about the UKIP again!
You are obsessed with Nigel Farage, but turn a blind eye to politicians and parties that facilitate paedophiles!!!
Ok, what do want to discuss about the UKIP next?
You seem to be obsessed with telling people that they want to talk about UKIP when clearly they don' (at least not very often).
You seem to be obsessed with people's alleged obsession with Mr Farage when they're not obsessed with him at all.
You do not know whether at least some politicans of all parties might have questionable records over the alleged facilitation of pædophiles.
What and who are "the lowest waged earners" at any given time? The term is presumably intended to denote "all those whose gross earnings from all sources are less than £x annually", but they cannot be taken out of income tax liability on their eranings altogether unless all can agree in advance on an earned income threshold figure then try to market policies designed to remove the income tax liability oin earnings of everyone whose earned income is lower than that figure; however, not all parties even agree on what that threshold should be.
What any of this has to do with people's attitudes to homosexuality, however, I have less than no idea.Last edited by ahinton; 13-03-14, 11:38.
Comment
-
Comment