Originally posted by teamsaint
View Post
Then, mildly revolutionary protest which could be quite frequent was slightly appalling for being too actively meaningful. Now, the nature of the conformity that is accepted makes the even milder non-conformism of our earlier times so acutely obvious it is alienating. There have always been small people in small worlds. That never changes. Some of them are among the best people it is possible to find. We, in contrast, were perhaps too big in what was a smaller world while feeling simultaneously small. The students of today feel much bigger but it would be hard not to see them as smaller in a bigger world. Grotesquely so in some ways. Merely monstrous in others. Business living environments now start via tablet in the pram.
I was interested to dig out this article in The Guardian from 2011. It is by a woman who was in the year above me at York and in the same college. She was now seeing her daughter into there. She chatted with the late Adrian Leftwich of whom I was well aware. It not only resonates. It touches on a lot of my ground including the need now to run courses on basic skills for students with A grades. It also refers to an emphasis not on the theory of changing the world - yes indeed, pamphlets were once written in bedrooms alongside even greater irrelevancies and oh what fun - but arguing over any grade that is given with what is the hard sell. I think what struck me most when I went counting was not the numbers regarding ethnicity or gender but of smiles on faces and what I saw of genuine laughter. They were, across the four days, smaller than the number of fingers that are needed to do jazz hands:
Comment