Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I've really heard it all now...and this came up unbidden in a conversation, not as a result of my own dislike of the practice. (Related to me by son of old friend...let's call him Mike.)
Mike was asked to be best man at a friend's wedding. He had to hire a morning suit (usual) and he and his wife had to travel and pay for accommodation (also usual). And buy a wedding present (usual). But Mike, THE BEST MAN, his wife and all other guests had to pay £35 per head for the wedding reception! At the hotel they were asked by the Reception staff to pay before entering the dining room.
If anyone thinks this could possibly be considered reasonable on the grounds of possible poverty of happy couple, I'd just say if they couldn't afford it, then tough. Just get hitched at the local register office and have done with it!
I am speechless. It really does seem to be considered OK by a younger generation to get other people to pay them for the hospitality they are offering...or not.
Mike was asked to be best man at a friend's wedding. He had to hire a morning suit (usual) and he and his wife had to travel and pay for accommodation (also usual). And buy a wedding present (usual). But Mike, THE BEST MAN, his wife and all other guests had to pay £35 per head for the wedding reception! At the hotel they were asked by the Reception staff to pay before entering the dining room.
If anyone thinks this could possibly be considered reasonable on the grounds of possible poverty of happy couple, I'd just say if they couldn't afford it, then tough. Just get hitched at the local register office and have done with it!
I am speechless. It really does seem to be considered OK by a younger generation to get other people to pay them for the hospitality they are offering...or not.
Comment