The Importance of Reaching a Broad Audience....?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nick Armstrong
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 26572

    The Importance of Reaching a Broad Audience....?

    I've just watched an episode of HardTalk which I recorded last week but which seems to be a repeat from earlier in the year, with Jonathan Miller.

    Interesting generally, as usual with Miller, e.g. his account of a spat with Bartoli in New York because she wanted to do something that was "not proper" i.e. interpolate two arias in an opera because "it would make her more noticeable"

    But it was this exchange that got me thinking, started by the rather over-earnest, BBC-compliant Stephen Sackur asking:


    SS: But it's also important to reach as broad an audience as possible isn't it?

    JM: No, I don't think that's important at all. I think what's important is....

    SS: You're quite happy to put on a show which attracts frankly just an élite audience?

    JM: Not an élite audience but an audience that in fact already has an interest in seeing something like that, in seeing something real. I'm not interested in having a statistically larger number of people coming to watch it than otherwise would. It's very nice if in fact the theatre is packed, but I'm perfectly happy to have a theatre which (like for example at the Rose Theatre at the moment in Kingston)... I'm very happy and indeed everyone in the cast is happy if there are 400 people there rather than 2000.


    Discuss!


    EDIT: Just seen that the programme is on both iPlayer



    and YouTube

    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

    "...the isle is full of noises,
    Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
    Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
    Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30456

    #2
    Not an élite audience but an audience that in fact already has an interest in seeing something like that, in seeing something real. I'm not interested in having a statistically larger number of people coming to watch it than otherwise would. It's very nice if in fact the theatre is packed, but I'm perfectly happy to have a theatre which (like for example at the Rose Theatre at the moment in Kingston)... I'm very happy and indeed everyone in the cast is happy if there are 400 people there rather than 2000.
    JM is speaking a foreign language, isn't he?

    Isn't Bartoli much as operatic divas (and divos) have always been? They wanted arias that would show them to good effect - composers often obliged.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • aeolium
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 3992

      #3
      I've often thought that Miller was something of a showman himself and probably what he didn't like about Bartoli was that he thought she was trying to make herself more noticeable than him.

      Nicholas Hytner obviously disagrees with Miller as he has initiated the NT's live broadcasts to cinema which has allowed many more people to see fine plays and productions than would otherwise have been the case. I think for the larger organisations like the NT (and of course the BBC) which receive public support, the size of the audience ought to be important, but it should not be obtained at the cost of compromising quality and seriousness.

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30456

        #4
        Originally posted by aeolium View Post
        Nicholas Hytner obviously disagrees with Miller
        But Miller was referring to the audience present in the theatre, 'coming to watch'. It's not clear that Hytner (or Tony Hall at the ROH) would have wanted to alter what they wanted to do in order to attract a bigger audience to the theatre: merely that technology can be used to take what they do to a bigger audience outside the confines of the theatre building, to people who would certainly 'have an interest' in going to the theatre if it was practicable for them.

        They are referring to different things rather than disagreeing
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • aeolium
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 3992

          #5
          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          But Miller was referring to the audience present in the theatre, 'coming to watch'. It's not clear that Hytner (or Tony Hall at the ROH) would have wanted to alter what they wanted to do in order to attract a bigger audience to the theatre: merely that technology can be used to take what they do to a bigger audience outside the confines of the theatre building, to people who would certainly 'have an interest' in going to the theatre if it was practicable for them.

          They are referring to different things rather than disagreeing

          Well, I was thinking of Miller's response to Sackur's question "It's important to reach as broad an audience as possible, isn't it?" where Miller says "I don't think that's important at all." I don't think Hytner would have responded like that. He would have said, I think, that it was important to reach as broad an audience as possible (and that is the whole point of the cinema project) but not to compromise on the content, the quality or the production style simply to do that - hence for instance the decision to make Phèdre the first NT play to be broadcast.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30456

            #6
            Originally posted by aeolium View Post
            Well, I was thinking of Miller's response to Sackur's question "It's important to reach as broad an audience as possible, isn't it?" where Miller says "I don't think that's important at all." I don't think Hytner would have responded like that. He would have said, I think, that it was important to reach as broad an audience as possible (and that is the whole point of the cinema project) but not to compromise on the content, the quality or the production style simply to do that - hence for instance the decision to make Phèdre the first NT play to be broadcast.
            Miller perhaps could have been a bit more thoughtful in his immediate reaction.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Andrew Slater
              Full Member
              • Mar 2007
              • 1797

              #7
              There's a difference between 'broad' and 'large'.....

              Comment

              • aeolium
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 3992

                #8
                Originally posted by Andrew Slater View Post
                There's a difference between 'broad' and 'large'.....
                Yes, indeed. I recall Hytner in one of his introductory interviews in the early NT Live cinema broadcasts touching on this and explaining that he wanted to extend the audience beyond those who would normally go to the theatre and were simply prevented from going to the NT by distance or price. By broadcasting to cinemas, more popular venues, and at cinema prices not the (usually) significantly higher theatre prices he thought it might be possible to draw in people who would not normally think of going to the theatre, people who might be intimidated by the more formal conventions of theatre-going. I'm not sure to what extent he has succeeded in doing that; my experience has been that there has been a larger and more diverse audience at the NT broadcasts than at the Met or ROH opera broadcasts which where I live seemed to draw those who were already opera-lovers.

                But what's interesting is the difference in the Hytner/NT approach from the BBC one. Hytner wants to widen the appeal for serious and sometimes 'difficult' drama without compromising on its presentation. The BBC seems to feel that the presentation has to be diluted when attempting to reach a wider audience - especially (as is seen in another thread re TV Proms) in its TV presentation. The result is that through a failure of nerve and intellectual confidence the future of linear, live arts broadcasting - at least to screen - is moving away from the public service broadcaster to independent arts companies, and ventures like the Guardian live streaming of Glyndebourne operas.

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #9
                  I think it's important to note how Miller comes to theatre directing - he does not run a theatre, he's not responsible for the finances, people will always find him when they want him to invest his particular undeniable talents in their production. In that sense he's an amateur and there is certainly a place for such people, especially when they're as good and as actor-friendly and as text-friendly as Miller is.

                  Miller's also a bit of a contrarian too - witness how he responded to most of Sackur's propositions about Miller - he loves taking up a position that challenges a status quo.

                  He does get damned good results too but he's not the person to run The Royal National Theatre ... or The Rose Theatre at Kingston, for that matter
                  Last edited by Guest; 18-08-13, 10:59. Reason: trypo

                  Comment

                  • Nick Armstrong
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 26572

                    #10
                    I agree ams. His unworldliness is appealing but is too simplistic to be the full story. Nonetheless we need people like him to keep the sodding bean-counters from running the show!
                    "...the isle is full of noises,
                    Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                    Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                    Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30456

                      #11
                      Originally posted by aeolium View Post
                      But what's interesting is the difference in the Hytner/NT approach from the BBC one. Hytner wants to widen the appeal for serious and sometimes 'difficult' drama without compromising on its presentation. The BBC seems to feel that the presentation has to be diluted when attempting to reach a wider audience - especially (as is seen in another thread re TV Proms) in its TV presentation. The result is that through a failure of nerve and intellectual confidence the future of linear, live arts broadcasting - at least to screen - is moving away from the public service broadcaster to independent arts companies, and ventures like the Guardian live streaming of Glyndebourne operas.
                      As I read your first paragraph, that was (perhaps not unsurprisingly!) the idea that was forming in my mind - that television is where you 'broaden' the audience.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • Nick Armstrong
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 26572

                        #12
                        What chimes for me in what Miller said was the importance of presenting "something real" - not something fake or watered-down.

                        For me, the "Urban Classic" prom, or the TV proms with the 'difficult' bits filleted away, are examples of something fake being constructed or presented to the public in the hope of 'a broader audience'.
                        "...the isle is full of noises,
                        Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                        Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                        Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          #13
                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          As I read your first paragraph, that was (perhaps not unsurprisingly!) the idea that was forming in my mind - that television is where you 'broaden' the audience.
                          But surely Hytner's model is about broadening the funding base as well as broadening the audience.

                          If punters will place their derrieres on a cinema seat for £11 as I have done at my local indie cinema to watch the Globe's films 'as alive' of its Shakespeare productions, and in so doing selling out the show rather than have 30% audience at £9 for a Sunday art film, then both aspirations are fulfilled.

                          Certainly this is how The Globe's director Dominic Dromgoole explained the innovation to a Q&A audience recently.


                          Their DVD of Twelfth Night with Mark Rylance and Stephen Fry is proving to be a very popular birthday present too
                          Last edited by Guest; 18-08-13, 11:13. Reason: italicising

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37814

                            #14
                            Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                            But surely Hytner's model is about broadening the funding base as well as broadening the audience.

                            If punters will place their derrieres on a cinema seat for £11 as I have done at my local indie cinema to watch the Globe's films 'as alive' of its Shakespeare productions, and in so doing selling out the show rather than have 30% audience at £9 for a Sunday art film, then both aspirations are fulfilled.

                            Certainly this is how The Globe's director Dominic Dromgoole explained the innovation to a Q&A audience recently.


                            Their DVD of Twelfth Night with Mark Rylance and Stephen Fry is proving to be a very popular birthday present too
                            Waheeey!!! And a very happy birthday to you, ams!!!

                            Comment

                            • amateur51

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                              Waheeey!!! And a very happy birthday to you, ams!!!
                              Slip me your birthdate and address and a copy shall be yours S_A

                              Always assuming that you have a DVD player.

                              NB: this offer is non-transferebable

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X