After all, a woman died as an indirect result of the media storm over its conception. The least the couple could do is insist that she is commentated by attributing one of what will undoubtedly be many names to the woman who died as a result of this child coming into being.
If the Royal baby is a girl, should the name 'Jacinta' be one of its names?!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostAfter all, a woman died as an indirect result of the media storm over its conception. The least the couple could do is insist that she is commentated by attributing one of what will undoubtedly be many names to the woman who died as a result of this child coming into being.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
-
-
Richard Tarleton
I can't think of a more dreadful burden to saddle the child with. Try to imagine the answer to the question "Why am I called that, mummy?" A completely blameless party to a disgraceful and tragic event (as indeed were the royal couple), the child would have to carry the burden for longest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostIt would be a lovely gesture if she were, but I really don't like the "should" in the title, pasty.
It was a very uncomfortable experience and I still have very uneasy feelings about it but it wasn't on the same scale as this event.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostThe reason I mention it is that I am a nurse and something similar happened to me. (Without going into details I was looking after a patient who was of interest to the media and I was lied to by a very plausible journalist. Fortunately, I realised I was being 'had' before I gave too many details.)
It was a very uncomfortable experience and I still have very uneasy feelings about it but it wasn't on the same scale as this event.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostI did wonder if I should use 'should' in the title but I can't edit it. (Perhaps the mods can help me here?). The reason I mention it is that I am a nurse and something similar happened to me. (Without going into details I was looking after a patient who was of interest to the media and I was lied to by a very plausible journalist. Fortunately, I realised I was being 'had' before I gave too many details.)
It was a very uncomfortable experience and I still have very uneasy feelings about it but it wasn't on the same scale as this event.
'Princess Jacinta Leveson Windsor' then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI'm really sorry to hear this, pasty; especially because you feel bad from the disgraceful behaviour of these despicable people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostI was thinking of paying tribute to the remaining family who must be feeling very strong emotions at this time. There was NO excuse for what these people did but it seems that the victim will simply be forgotten about at this time of public interest and rejoicing.
Comment
-
-
NO!
But I sympathise and, speaking as a leftish republican with no love for royalty, this child and its parents had nothing to do with the tragedy; its family should name it as all families should [and that includes the Middeltons I would hope, not some hi-jacking by the Palace]. What if it had been some over-bloated celebrity's child instead?
If anyone needs to look at their conscience over the Jacinta issue perhaps it's the media and more so the public who have this insane appetite for gossip.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostI was thinking of paying tribute to the remaining family who must be feeling very strong emotions at this time. There was NO excuse for what these people did but it seems that the victim will simply be forgotten about at this time of public interest and rejoicing.
The hospital has a lot to answer for rather than blaming the idiots who phoned up etc
but surely it should be Wayne for a boy and Tracey for a girl ?
Comment
-
Comment