The Ashes 2013

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nick Armstrong
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 26606

    Originally posted by mercia View Post
    but as a competition with a prize we wouldn't have "won" either - a neutral country ( Albania ? ) should look after the Ashes until they are "won"

    stupid game
    "...the isle is full of noises,
    Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
    Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
    Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

    Comment

    • mercia
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 8920

      I do understand really, but I'll put it another way

      if we win tests 4 or 5 (or both) we will have "won" the series (yes ?), so is there an extra "prize" for doing that ? or will we simply have won the Ashes in addition to retaining them ?


      oh dear, if tests 4 and 5 were drawn, would we have "won" the series 2-0 ?

      Comment

      • hedgehog

        Originally posted by mercia View Post
        I do understand really, but I'll put it another way

        if we win tests 4 or 5 (or both) we will have "won" the series (yes ?), so is there an extra "prize" for doing that ? or will we simply have won the Ashes in addition to retaining them ?


        oh dear, if tests 4 and 5 were drawn, would we have "won" the series 2-0 ?
        Yes mercia, moral victories!

        Well back to "see who can slump the farthest' cricket again. Lyon bowled well, but England's bowlers can do as well, we shall see.

        Comment

        • Pabmusic
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 5537

          Originally posted by mercia View Post
          I do understand really, but I'll put it another way

          if we win tests 4 or 5 (or both) we will have "won" the series (yes ?), so is there an extra "prize" for doing that ? or will we simply have won the Ashes in addition to retaining them ?


          oh dear, if tests 4 and 5 were drawn, would we have "won" the series 2-0 ?
          Perhaps it is easiest to separate the ashes from the series. We might yet win the series, or it could be drawn if the Aussies win the next two matches. In either event we will have retained the ashes. 'Winning' the ashes was never an option for us, because we had them anyway. Only the Aussies could have 'won' the ashes this series (as they could next series, too).

          If they do do win them next series, we'll get a chance to win them back in the one after that.

          Comment

          • mercia
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 8920

            thanks Pab. I do understand (honestly). I'm not very bright. I seem to be obsessed with what does or does not get presented [in terms of "cup" or "prize"] at the end of the fifth test. A drawn series - nothing. A won series - nothing. Medals to all for taking part.
            Last edited by mercia; 10-08-13, 04:30.

            Comment

            • Pabmusic
              Full Member
              • May 2011
              • 5537

              Originally posted by mercia View Post
              thanks Pab. I do understand (honestly). I'm not very bright. I seem to be obsessed with what does or does not get presented [in terms of "cup" or "prize"] at the end of the fifth test. A drawn series - nothing. A won series - nothing. Medals to all for taking part.
              I don't know the answer to that, but (in general) the Ashes aren't really presented beyond being brought out for a photo sometimes - they're kept at Lord's. I think they were taken to Australia at least once for a special series, though, and brought back again (?Ashes Centenary).

              Comment

              • mercia
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 8920

                yes, well the Ashes wouldn't need to be presented because nobody would have won them (as we've established). I shall stop now. I'm really beginning to annoy myself.

                Comment

                • Pabmusic
                  Full Member
                  • May 2011
                  • 5537

                  Originally posted by mercia View Post
                  yes, well the Ashes wouldn't need to be presented because nobody would have won them (as we've established). I shall stop now. I'm really beginning to annoy myself.
                  You're certainly not annoying me, but the system is very (what shall I say) ... Victorian public school.

                  Comment

                  • antongould
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 8855

                    I could go to Google but they are not such nice chaps!

                    Is this the most northerly Ashes Test ever played?

                    Very nice morning here a mile from the wicket but it could swing a little....

                    Comment

                    • amateur51

                      No-one has mentioned the possibility of a tied result

                      I'll get my coat

                      Comment

                      • amateur51

                        Oooh Broad's taken three, Australia 30 mins before lunch are 49-3, Michael Clarke the latest out to a brilliant catch (apparently) by Cook.

                        The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online




                        Last edited by Guest; 10-08-13, 11:38. Reason: trypo

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                          Oooh Broad's taken three, Australia 30 mins before lunch are 49-3, Michael Clarke the latest out to a brilliant catch (apparently) by Cook.

                          The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online




                          Australia 148-4 at tea, still 90 runs behind.

                          Even Trott's bowling

                          Comment

                          • hedgehog

                            A few dropped catches and reprieve for Rogers, a bit of luck going Australia's way, England may lose out on this one, it should be a result, looking t the weather forecast. Maybe they an make a big score in the 2nd innings though? The wicket does look very flat at the moment. Perhaps it'll be a bit more lively in the morning.

                            Comment

                            • Sir Velo
                              Full Member
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 3288

                              Bizarre that England's match winner, Stuart Broad, is still routinely called "Chris" by commentators and fans alike. Ditto, Chris "Tim" Tremlett. It can't just be that their fathers were recent players as I can't recall ever hearing Jonny Bairstow called "David" or Nick Compton "Denis"; nor that their fathers were more eminent for, as the crowd chanted: "He's big; he's bad; He's better than his Dad; Stuart Broad; Stuart Broad!"

                              Going back a generation or two, I don't recall any commentator call Shaun Pollock "Peter", or even "Graham"; Alec Stewart, was never to my memory apostrophised as "Micky" and neither Graham or Chris Cowdrey was ever accorded the distinction of being referred to as "Colin"; ditto Richard and Len Hutton.

                              Ho hum. One of life's little mysteries!

                              Comment

                              • amateur51

                                Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                                Bizarre that England's match winner, Stuart Broad, is still routinely called "Chris" by commentators and fans alike. Ditto, Chris "Tim" Tremlett. It can't just be that their fathers were recent players as I can't recall ever hearing Jonny Bairstow called "David" or Nick Compton "Denis"; nor that their fathers were more eminent for, as the crowd chanted: "He's big; he's bad; He's better than his Dad; Stuart Broad; Stuart Broad!"

                                Going back a generation or two, I don't recall any commentator call Shaun Pollock "Peter", or even "Graham"; Alec Stewart, was never to my memory apostrophised as "Micky" and neither Graham or Chris Cowdrey was ever accorded the distinction of being referred to as "Colin"; ditto Richard and Len Hutton.

                                Ho hum. One of life's little mysteries!
                                Oooh don't you go on, and so inconsequentially!

                                An extraordinary win for England, completely against the tide at one point, Stuart Broad producing high class fast (90 mph) bowling that proved to be irresistible by the Australia. Bell's second innings performance was crucial too but Broad's bowling in both innings resulted in his being Man of the Match.

                                England have now won the Ashes series and they go to the Oval to finish the series - come on Cook and Root, let's see a huge opening stand for England to throw down the gauntlet for the return Winter series in Australia

                                There again, perhaps the Australian bowlers and Clarke and Warner may return the favour

                                Test cricket at its best

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X