Old lady dies (see other post)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Originally posted by mangerton View Post
    I'm not going to be drawn into a discussion of whether it's "classical" or not, but the first two notes of Bernstein's "Maria" are an augmented fourth or tritone.
    More interesting IMV is that the melody from "Black Sabbath" by the band of the same name is also composed of a note, it's octave and the tritone
    so much for the "musical ignorance" of Heavy Metal then

    Comment

    • EdgeleyRob
      Guest
      • Nov 2010
      • 12180

      Originally posted by Beef Oven View Post
      In your wardrobe?
      Any fifths in this ?

      Comment

      • teamsaint
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 25251

        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
        More interesting IMV is that the melody from "Black Sabbath" by the band of the same name is also composed of a note, it's octave and the tritone
        so much for the "musical ignorance" of Heavy Metal then
        well that is one to check out. Cheers gongers.
        (lost my copy of that album)
        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

        I am not a number, I am a free man.

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          Re. #359, please, when it comes to music I am no expert. I am an enthusiast, certainly, but my formal musical studies were terminated by a change of schools associated with a family relocation in my youth. Sure I later learned from other far more tutored members of the Scratch Orchestra (including some private drumming tuition from the great Eddie Prevost) and managed to include a 'half-module' in electronic music as part of my undergraduate studies but my response to music remains largely visceral rather than technical. In terms of music theory I am basically an autodidact, and not a particularly diligent one.

          Comment

          • Mr Pee
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3285

            Originally posted by hedgehog View Post
            I feel I must correct this. Mr Pee: the terms 'major' and 'minor' are used only with the intervals of a 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 7th (or higher e.g. a maj. 9th which is an octave plus a major 2nd)

            The interval of a 5th as found at the opening of Also Sprach Zarathustra is a perfect 5th (it doesn't matter whether it is rising or falling) The interval of a tritone (eg F to B ) is called either an augmented 4th or a diminished 5th according to how the harmony is working .The first interval at the beginning of Tristan und Isolde is a minor 6th surely ( A - F) ?
            Of course you are right on all counts. My apologies. Of course both Tristan and Love Story are Minor Sixths. I am easily confused these days......

            Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

            Mark Twain.

            Comment

            • Tony Halstead
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 1717

              Originally posted by mangerton View Post
              I'm not going to be drawn into a discussion of whether it's "classical" or not, but the first two notes of Bernstein's "Maria" are an augmented fourth or tritone.
              Of course they are! But in terms of functional harmony () the 2nd note is actually an appogiatura leading to the 3rd note which is a 'perfect 5th' from the 1st note.

              Comment

              • Nick Armstrong
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 26601

                Originally posted by waldhorn View Post
                Of course they are! But in terms of functional harmony () the 2nd note is actually an appogiatura leading to the 3rd note which is a 'perfect 5th' from the 1st note.







                "...the isle is full of noises,
                Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                Comment

                • Beef Oven

                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  Re. #359, please, when it comes to music I am no expert. I am an enthusiast, certainly, but my formal musical studies were terminated by a change of schools associated with a family relocation in my youth. Sure I later learned from other far more tutored members of the Scratch Orchestra (including some private drumming tuition from the great Eddie Prevost) and managed to include a 'half-module' in electronic music as part of my undergraduate studies but my response to music remains largely visceral rather than technical. In terms of music theory I am basically an autodidact, and not a particularly diligent one.
                  Perhaps I shouldn't have referred to individuals, but I think the point was an important one to make. Thanks for the clarification in your case.

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                    I sometimes think that the purpose of some parts of music theory IS to confuse things! A six semitone interval is a six semitone interval, for instance, whatever it is called.
                    Aha! We're witnessing the birth of a Babbittean/Fortean set theorist here, folks!
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • EdgeleyRob
                      Guest
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 12180

                      Originally posted by waldhorn View Post
                      Of course they are! But in terms of functional harmony () the 2nd note is actually an appogiatura leading to the 3rd note which is a 'perfect 5th' from the 1st note.

                      Think I'll just stick to listening.

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37995

                        Originally posted by waldhorn View Post
                        Of course they are! But in terms of functional harmony () the 2nd note is actually an appogiatura leading to the 3rd note which is a 'perfect 5th' from the 1st note.
                        A rather long duration to be an apoggiatura, I would have thought, waldhorn - but you're probably right: I haven't actually seen the score.

                        Like Bryn I am an autodidact in music theoretical terms. I've never quite grasped chord inversions, though I do understand the term to refer to the way a chord is "voiced": for instance the C, E and G of a C major tonic triad can be distributed across three distinct octaves, and it depends in which octave the notes other than the C are placed that determines whether it is a first, second, third etc chord inversion. It's confusing because - if I've got this right - an interval - as opposed to a chord inversion, consists simply in looking at any particular interval "upside down". So that a major second becomes a minor seventh, a fourth a fifth, and so on. Very useful to serial composers in varying the pitch range while staying true to the series. The previously mentioned tritone, or augmented fourth, is known as "the devil's interval" because whichever way up it is, it cannot be inverted: it is always an augmented fourth.

                        The other thing I never understand is why some composers use double sharps and flats in their notation. Why can't they be decent human beings and just notate the pitch a major second up or down: it would make sight-reading so much easier!!!

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View Post
                          So does twinkle twinkle little star start with a major(?) rising fifth.
                          See what I mean,who needs music theory text books.
                          All we need to know is here,for which I am seriously thankful.
                          Nearly, Rob: it's an rising Perfect Fifth.


                          It might help scottycelt (and other Brucknerians) to know that the opening two notes of the horn solo at the start of the Fourth Symphony is a falling perfect fifth (and the distance between the second and third notes is another rising fifth). At the start of the next phrase, the Horn plays a falling minor sixth.

                          In the Sixth Symphony, the distance between the first two long notes in the 'celli right at the start is another falling fifth. The first three notes in the solo Trumpet at the start of the Third Symphony is the opening of Also Sprach Zarathustra played backwards (not that Anton was aware of this).
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • Bryn
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 24688

                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                            ... The other thing I never understand is why some composers use double sharps and flats in their notation. Why can't they be decent human beings and just notate the pitch a major second up or down: it would make sight-reading so much easier!!!
                            I think Morton Feldman has something to say about his use of such notation in one of the talks available to listen to over at the Other Minds site. I will have a look and post a link if I find it.

                            Hmm, not from that source, but here is a paragraph on the topic from Erik Ulman's notes to a recording of Feldman's Patterns in a Chromatic Field for Cello and Piano:

                            Realizing these “notational images” makes extreme demands on the performers’ skill and concentration, demands that Charles Curtis and Aleck Karis meet with impeccable precision, tact, and delicacy. But for the cello the complications of Feldman’s notation comprise not only rhythm but also consistently eccentric enharmonic spellings: its opening “chromatic field” is written not as, for example, A, A-flat, G, B-flat, but, awkwardly, as B-double-flat,A-flat, F-double-sharp, A-sharp, implying infinitesimal microtonal deviations and alienating sound from “how the music looks.” For Feldman, this difficult notation alters “the focus of the pitch,” and as such prevents a “hardening of the categories”: “Which gets us, believe it or not, to why I use the [microtonal] spelling.... When you’re working with a minor second as long as I’ve been, it’s very wide. I hear a minor second like a minor third almost.... It depends on how quickly or slowly that note is comng to you, like McEnroe. I’m sure that he sees that ball coming in slow motion. And that’s the way I hear that pitch. It’s coming to me very slowly, and there’s a lot of stuff in there.” When, later in the work, Feldman follows a G-double-sharp in the cello with a B-double-flat, he brings the latent microtonal friction into the foreground, illuminating the pitch world’s underlying instability while also attaining a strange poignancy.
                            Last edited by Bryn; 13-04-13, 23:00. Reason: Credit added.

                            Comment

                            • Beef Oven

                              Does this contain a rising 5th, or a rissole or perhaps a faggot?


                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                                A rather long duration to be an apoggiatura, I would have thought, waldhorn - but you're probably right: I haven't actually seen the score.
                                An apoggiatura (unlike an acciacatura, which is a Grace Note, or Crushed Note in its Sunday best and should all be played/sung as fast as possible) can be as long as it likes. Up 'til about the late 19th Century, the convention was for it to be half as long as the rhythmic value of the note that followed it; by the time of Mahler, it could go on forever!

                                Like Bryn I am an autodidact in music theoretical terms. I've never quite grasped chord inversions, though I do understand the term to refer to the way a chord is "voiced": for instance the C, E and G of a C major tonic triad can be distributed across three distinct octaves, and it depends in which octave the notes other than the C are placed that determines whether it is a first, second, third etc chord inversion.
                                This is tricky without manuscript paper, but the easiest way of dealing with this is to hear a triad of C major. If the very lowest note that you hear is a C (any C, in any octave, so long as no other note is lower) then it's in Root Position. If it's a triad of C major with the lowest note E (any E, no matter what the octave, so long as no other note is lower) then it's Cmajor in First Inversion. If it's a C major triad with G the lowest note (any G ... etc etc) then it's C major in Second inversion.

                                Third Inversions can only occur in Seventh chords (say G7 = GBDF: if it's a G7 chord with F as the lowest note then it's G7 in Third Inversion.

                                It's confusing because - if I've got this right - an interval - as opposed to a chord inversion consists simply in looking at any particular interval "upside down". So that a majopr second becomes a minor seventh, a fourth a fifth, and so on. The previously mentioned tritone, or augmented fourth, is klnown as "the devil's interval" because whichever way up it is, it cannot be inverted: it is always an augmented fourth.
                                Yes, this is all correct. Chords are regarded as "Vertical" entities, Intervals as "Horizontal".

                                At least; this is how I've understood it (with some "fine tuning") for the past forty years: if anyone knows any differently, please break the news to me gently!

                                The other thing I never understand is why some composers use double sharps and flats in their notation. Why can't they be decent human beings and just notate the pitch a major second up or down: it would make sight-reading so much easier!!!
                                Ah! But it would be Tonally wrong: in G# major/minor, the leading note is F double-sharp, not G natural (just as in G major, the Leading note is F#, not Gb). Good players of "proper" instruments and singers instinctively make a different pitch - it's only on Keyboard instruments that F# and Gb (or F double sharp and G natural) are "the same"!
                                Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 13-04-13, 22:44. Reason: Helps to get the spelling of "Acciacatura" right!
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X