Originally posted by Sir Velo
View Post
Test Your Vocabulary
Collapse
X
-
I got congeries too and did know what it meant. A bigger test would be its pronunciation - clue: it's Latin not French! Got around 3400 on several attempts - I blame the slow SW broadband...
Glad I didn't get bloviate though! PS Yuk: it's not an English word at all - it's American!I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
I wish I'd got congeries because I did know it because it's Latin.
It's one of that select group of 5th declension nouns, like res. It wouldn't occur to me to use in in English.
But while I can understand how important a factor speed is in assessing proficiency at mental arithmetic, why is it relevant to knowledge of vocabulary?
(I ask because I only got 35something)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostBut while I can understand how important a factor speed is in assessing proficiency at mental arithmetic, why is it relevant to knowledge of vocabulary?
(I ask because I only got 35something)
Comment
-
-
WOAH! Clearly a good night's sleep helps - 3840 this morning
Has anyone analysed whether different tests give different proportions of harder/hardest words? This could presumably set a higher theoretical maximum score, so maybe Sir Velo was just LUCKYI keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostI wish I'd got congeries because I did know it because it's Latin. / ... / It wouldn't occur to me to use in in English.
Here's a useful addition -
"Often congeries is simply the Latin term for synathroesmus ("collection"). However, the Latin term seems to emphasize the emotional amplification of such an accumulation, making congeries akin to climax and grouped among both the Figures of Pathos and the Figures of Amplification (Thus Melanchthon distinguishes incrementum [climax] as a kind of congeries). If the piling up occurs by rapidly touching on one thing and then another, congeries may be considered a type of epitrochasmus.Some authorities equate congeries with synonymia (as Melanchthon 1523 D1r; 1531 D4v-E1r))"
Comment
-
-
It's close to the original, literal, meaning, but I wouldn't have thought it was enough to cover how it's used today -even in the USA, unless it's one of those words which retain an older meaning when they cross the Atlantic. From the OED:
Etymology: < French piquer to anger, annoy (1458 in Middle French), (reflexive) to get angry (c1590 in Middle French), to stimulate, provoke (1615), (reflexive) to take pride in, boast about (1623), spec. uses of piquer to prick, pierce, sting (see pick v.1). Compare Occitan picar (relexive) to be offended, Italian piccare (reflexive) to be offended (a1342), to anger, provoke (1611), (reflexive) to pride oneself in (1615), Spanish picar to anger, provoke, (reflexive) to be offended, to pride oneself in (a1496 in the latter sense).
Comment
-
-
Resurrection Man
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostWell, there are probably some unscrupulous types who might be inclined to have a dictionary to hand.
Best is now 3900
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I've always liked congeries as a word, I think because it looks as if it ought to be a plural but is in fact a singular. I blush to confess that I do use it...
So how is it pronounced then? Hard 'g' like the eel, or 'con-jerries' ?
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment