He hardly put a foot wrong - but then he hardly said anything!
University Challenge
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostHe hardly put a foot wrong - but then he hardly said anything!"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostWOT??? No University Challenge tonight???? It's ruined my week......
Teams are off playing Switzerland or San Marino I expect.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
One very iffy question last night - the greenfinch question had me stumped. Greenfinches have only been assigned to the genus Chloris since 2012 - in all but the most recent bird books it is a member of the genus Carduelis. Wiki sums up: The greenfiches were formerly placed in the genus Carduelis. Molecular phylogenetic studies showed that the greenfinches form a monophyletic group that is not closely related to the species in Carduelis and instead is sister to a clade containing the desert finch (Rhodospiza obsoleta) and the Socotra golden-winged grosbeak (Rhynchostruthus socotranus). The greenfinches were therefore moved to the resurrected genus Chloris which had originally been introduced by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1800 with the European greenfinch as the type species. The name is from Ancient Greek khloris, the European greenfinch, from khloros, "green".
So there. Only a seriously up-to-speed ornithologist versed in the latest DNA work is likely to have known that - I didn't. The question setter was probably unaware of this recent change, merely flipping open the office bird book at random to choose three species of bird on the same page.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostOne very iffy question last night - the greenfinch question had me stumped. Greenfinches have only been assigned to the genus Chloris since 2012 - in all but the most recent bird books it is a member of the genus Carduelis. Wiki sums up: The greenfiches were formerly placed in the genus Carduelis. Molecular phylogenetic studies showed that the greenfinches form a monophyletic group that is not closely related to the species in Carduelis and instead is sister to a clade containing the desert finch (Rhodospiza obsoleta) and the Socotra golden-winged grosbeak (Rhynchostruthus socotranus). The greenfinches were therefore moved to the resurrected genus Chloris which had originally been introduced by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1800 with the European greenfinch as the type species. The name is from Ancient Greek khloris, the European greenfinch, from khloros, "green".
So there. Only a seriously up-to-speed ornithologist versed in the latest DNA work is likely to have known that - I didn't. The question setter was probably unaware of this recent change, merely flipping open the office bird book at random to choose three species of bird on the same page.
Rather easy music questions I thought. It's probably wrong to be surprised, but I thought the University of East London did very well. Had they not dithered over the 'at-' prefix question, they might even have won.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by LMcD View PostDidn't Reynaldo Hahn dedicate one of his songs to a greenfinch?
If it be true, Chloris, that you love me,
(And I'm told you love me dearly),
I do not believe that even kings
Can match the happiness I know.
Even death would be powerless
To alter my fortune
With the promise of heavenly bliss!
All that they say of ambrosia
Does not stir my imagination
Like the favour of your eyes!
(I have the Susan Graham recording)
The specific name has always been chloris, it's the assignation of genus that is only 6 years old.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostFortunately for us, it was probably easier to guess 'green' from chloris.
Rather easy music questions I thought. It's probably wrong to be surprised, but I thought the University of East London did very well. Had they not dithered over the 'at-' prefix question, they might even have won.Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 23-10-18, 21:17.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostI agree, word for word. But at least it was an enjoyably close-fought contest this time.Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 23-10-18, 21:13.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment