University Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
    .
    Not a good way to go, MrGG. This highlights a deficiency in the breadth of the current secondary curriculum
    It does

    Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
    There are all sorts of deficiencies in the breadth of the current secondary school curricula* (see what I did there? ); I suspect that the absence of Latin is one of lesser importance.

    * in case anyone is tempted to point out that there is a National Curriculum that applies to all state schools, & therefore my use of the plural is not justified, I would like to point out that Scotland has its own national curriculum.
    Though the NC is becoming less relevant as fewer schools need to take any notice of it at all.

    (I love the way that in Scotland there is a "Waynes World" curriculum )

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30453

      Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
      Wouldn't the concept of proof be covered by a)?
      Somewhat - but you may offer a piece of information which supports your viewpoint without necessarily feeling you have proved it.
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • aka Calum Da Jazbo
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 9173

        as in not eating all one's pudding perhaps ....
        According to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.

        Comment

        • Flosshilde
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7988

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          Somewhat - but you may offer a piece of information which supports your viewpoint without necessarily feeling you have proved it.
          Quite probably; but that wouldn't exclude the possibility of the piece of information proving it, would it? A prosecution lawyer, in a murder case, might put forward a piece of information, for example a film of the accused stabbing the victim, which would conclusively prove that the accused was guilty.

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37812

            Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
            This might be a better example, and the reason why Wolf Hall is written the way it is.

            Cromwell kept looking at the king, but he didn't reply.

            Who is he?

            Cromwell kept looking at the king, but he, Cromwell, didn't reply.
            (I can see why keeping the 'he' grates for some.)
            Otherwise, we need:
            Cromwell kept looking at the king, but the king didn't reply.

            Without a repeated Cromwell or king, wouldn't 'king' be implied by the 'he' (i.e., the last named, as I tried to say more clumsily above!)?
            I would think that the answer as to who "he" was would depend on some kind of context; i.e. it had been previously established that either Cromwell of the king was awaiting some kind of reply.

            Surely context is all-important, and the fact that the Cromwell example offers no context is the source of this kind of misunderstanding. Jean is right in this circumstance, having established an a priori context in her contributions to the thread discussion that led up to the "contentious" post.

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30453

              Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
              Quite probably; but that wouldn't exclude the possibility the piece of information proving it, would it?
              I suppose it wouldn't exclude the possibility of a piece of information proving something. I have now lost track of what was being cited to 'prove' the uselessness of Latin (was it? or something else?). I may cite my primary schoolteacher in saying that it is wrong to split an infinitive, end a sentence with a preposition or begin one with a conjunction. True it was that she said so, but I don't now believe that what she said was correct, or 'true'.
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20572

                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                Though the NC is becoming less relevant as fewer schools need to take any notice of it at all.
                It's being carried forward as a punishment for those who refuse to be bamboozled into converting to Ac***** status.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                  It's being carried forward as a punishment for those who refuse to be bamboozled into converting to Ac***** status.
                  We aren't allowed to talk about politics
                  BUT

                  Who can I vote for to reverse the nonsense?

                  Erm

                  Comment

                  • Historian
                    Full Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 648

                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    We aren't allowed to talk about politics
                    BUT

                    Who can I vote for to reverse the nonsense?

                    Erm
                    Haven't checked in detail but according to the brief BBC manifesto guide, Respect wants to end conversion of schools into academies. The Greens want to bring free schools and academies under the local authority system. As to whether either of them would require all schools to follow the National Curriculum, I do not know.

                    Edit; Looking at the Greens' manifesto in more detail they are against a 'strict curriculum', but they do want 'A broad, balanced and enriching curriculum, including creative and vocational areas'.
                    Last edited by Historian; 16-04-15, 16:48. Reason: Misplaced apostrophe.

                    Comment

                    • Pulcinella
                      Host
                      • Feb 2014
                      • 11062

                      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                      I would think that the answer as to who "he" was would depend on some kind of context; i.e. it had been previously established that either Cromwell of the king was awaiting some kind of reply.

                      Surely context is all-important, and the fact that the Cromwell example offers no context is the source of this kind of misunderstanding. Jean is right in this circumstance, having established an a priori context in her contributions to the thread discussion that led up to the "contentious" post.
                      Indeed.

                      I did say `might be a better example.....'


                      And I did say that I would not have queried Jean's original sentence.


                      But I will continue to maintain that avoiding the `it' (or the `he' in the Cromwell/king example) usually leads to a clearer (even pellucid) statement.


                      And I must learn to stop using emoticons.

                      Comment

                      • Flosshilde
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7988

                        Yes, they're lacking in pellucidity.

                        Comment

                        • MrGongGong
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 18357

                          Originally posted by Historian View Post
                          Haven't checked in detail but according to the brief BBC manifesto guide, Respect wants to end conversion of schools into academies. The Greens want to bring free schools and academies under the local authority system. As to whether either of them would require all schools to follow the National Curriculum, I do not know.

                          Edit; Looking at the Green's manifesto in more detail they are against a 'strict curriculum', but they do want 'A broad, balanced and enriching curriculum, including creative and vocational areas'.
                          Can't vote for either of them here

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37812

                            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                            Can't vote for either of them here
                            You're 7 days too late to stand as an Independent Anarchist candidate I'm afraid, MrGG.

                            Comment

                            • MrGongGong
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 18357

                              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                              You're 7 days too late to stand as an Independent Anarchist candidate I'm afraid, MrGG.
                              I wouldn't vote for me in 1,000,000 years

                              Comment

                              • Serial_Apologist
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 37812

                                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                                I wouldn't vote for me in 1,000,000 years
                                To judge by civilisation's present decline and fall, I'd say it won't take long to get there.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X