If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The former head of the British Army, independent crossbench peer Lord Dannatt, used his speech during the debate in the House of Lords yesterday, to attack the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, saying its process was “an abuse”, and saying that it went against what he “spent 40 years of his professional life upholding”.
The former head of the British Army, independent crossbench peer Lord Dannatt, used his speech during the debate in the House of Lords yesterday, to attack the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill.
So, no gay soldiers under your command in the army eh, Lord Dannatt?
Does that name sound familiar? Why yes, in another life he was Chief of the General Staff, Sir Richard Dannatt and he's now General The Lord Dannatt GCB CBE MC DL, President of Help for Heroes.
Of course, it's the apparent fast-tracking of the Bill through Parliament that concerns Baron Dannatt
Of course
Last edited by Guest; 04-06-13, 14:51.
Reason: trypos
The former head of the British Army, independent crossbench peer Lord Dannatt, used his speech during the debate in the House of Lords yesterday, to attack the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, saying its process was “an abuse”, and saying that it went against what he “spent 40 years of his professional life upholding”.
"Peers have voted by more than two to one to back government plans for same-sex marriages in England and Wales.The House of Lords spent two days debating the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, with many members voicing their concerns.
But it rejected an amendment aimed at wrecking the bill by 242 votes, moving it a step closer to becoming law."
"Peers have voted by more than two to one to back government plans for same-sex marriages in England and Wales.The House of Lords spent two days debating the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, with many members voicing their concerns.
But it rejected an amendment aimed at wrecking the bill by 242 votes, moving it a step closer to becoming law."
Michael (now Lord) Berkeley spoke in favour of equal marriage, referring to the criminalised relationship of his godfather Benjamin Britten and Peter Pears. Good for him.
So you'll be getting married soon?* Or is it just the politics of revenge?
*Hope I get an invite, I'm only round the corner from you
You've mentioned this 'revenge' business before Beefy. What's wrong with revenge in this context? - you get to wind up ALL the Faith groups AND the Tories - talk about irresistible!
Michael (now Lord) Berkeley spoke in favour of equal marriage, referring to the criminalised relationship of his godfather Benjamin Britten and Peter Pears. Good for him.
Many thanks for this Mary - I hope they'd be proud of him. I know I am
You've mentioned this 'revenge' business before Beefy. What's wrong with revenge in this context? - you get to wind up ALL the Faith groups AND the Tories - talk about irresistible!
So do I get an invite? I'm a very generous present-giver.
Michael (now Lord) Berkeley spoke in favour of equal marriage, referring to the criminalised relationship of his godfather Benjamin Britten and Peter Pears. Good for him.
You don't need SSM to decriminalise people! It was quite rightly decriminalised yonks ago!
Btw, it's SSM, not equal marriage. Equal marriage is CP.
You don't need SSM to decriminalise people! It was quite rightly decriminalised yonks ago!
Btw, it's SSM, not equal marriage. Equal marriage is CP.
Not sure I follow your second point, but I'm no expert. I don't know exactly what he said about BB and PP, just that he brought them into it, presumably as an example of a couple whose relationship wasn't legal for most of their lives together, and who obviously should have been married. BB refers to it as a marriage in his letters.
Not sure I follow your second point, but I'm no expert. I don't know exactly what he said about BB and PP, just that he brought them into it, presumably as an example of a couple whose relationship wasn't legal for most of their lives together, and who obviously should have been married. BB refers to it as a marriage in his letters.
It is terribly sad when you think about what BB & PP had to endure (that's to say nothing of ordinary people in the same boat).
I'm so glad we put things right with Civil Partnership
No - same-sex marriage is 'putting it right'. Civil Partnerships aren't recognised in many countries, so people in a CP wouldn't have the same rights as married people would.
Comment