Richard the Third

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    Just as a matter of interest, Bbm - why do you just cite John of Gaunt as your ancestor? You go back much further than that through his lineage: Edwards III, II and I, Henry III, King John, Henry II (Peter O'Toole!) Queen Mathilda, Henry I, William the Conqueror.

    Descendants of John of Gaunt are hereditarily "closer" in their ancestory to William than they are to Richard III!


    Usurpers the lot of 'em, of course.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • Bryn
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 24688

      Did anyone else here watch last night's Channel 4 update on Richard III's spine and its relevance to his fighting prowess and final battle? I messed up recording the first section by switching to HD, but did watch it, and recorded the rest. Very well done, I thought. Those C15 types knew how to make a riding saddle suited to a horseman with scoliosis. Worth catching on 4oD.

      Comment

      • BBMmk2
        Late Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 20908

        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
        Just as a matter of interest, Bbm - why do you just cite John of Gaunt as your ancestor? You go back much further than that through his lineage: Edwards III, II and I, Henry III, King John, Henry II (Peter O'Toole!) Queen Mathilda, Henry I, William the Conqueror.

        Descendants of John of Gaunt are hereditarily "closer" in their ancestory to William than they are to Richard III!


        Usurpers the lot of 'em, of course.
        Well, The Plantagenet Family Tree, is widespread, most certainly. RIII would be a link to that, as Richard II was an uncle I believe of JoG,and with my family routes going much further back to William I and beyond that to the Kings of Norway.
        Don’t cry for me
        I go where music was born

        J S Bach 1685-1750

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
          Richard II was an uncle I believe of JoG
          The other way round, Bbm - JofG was brother of the Black Prince, who was RII's father, so Uncle of RII, one of the most powerful people in England when Richard became king at the age of ten. JofG could be said to have been responsible for the "Peasants' Revolt", having been the architect of the Poll Tax (and other laws designed to keep the lower orders in their place). Had he not been in London at the time of the Revolt, the rioters might well have executed him. Fortunately, all his children had been born by then, so you would still be among us even if he had been in London!

          You're also a very distant relative of Geoffrey Chaucer (who ended up as JofG's brother-in-law) which for my money is worth more than all of these royals put together!
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • BBMmk2
            Late Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 20908

            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
            The other way round, Bbm - JofG was brother of the Black Prince, who was RII's father, so Uncle of RII, one of the most powerful people in England when Richard became king at the age of ten. JofG could be said to have been responsible for the "Peasants' Revolt", having been the architect of the Poll Tax (and other laws designed to keep the lower orders in their place). Had he not been in London at the time of the Revolt, the rioters might well have executed him. Fortunately, all his children had been born by then, so you would still be among us even if he had been in London!

            You're also a very distant relative of Geoffrey Chaucer (who ended up as JofG's brother-in-law) which for my money is worth more than all of these royals put together!
            Yes, and probably why I have an interest in Chaucer!
            Don’t cry for me
            I go where music was born

            J S Bach 1685-1750

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
              Yes, and probably why I have an interest in Chaucer!
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • Sir Velo
                Full Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 3225

                Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                But I must say that I can say that I have links with RIII
                I wouldn't be singing this from the treetops quite so loudly if one of my ancestors was a multi infanticidal deformed usurping regicide.
                Last edited by Sir Velo; 18-08-14, 13:28. Reason: Omissions and clarifications

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                  I wouldn't be singing this from the treetops quite so loudly if one of my ancestors was a multi infanticidal deformed megalomaniac.
                  That "if" regarding the "multi infanticidal" is pretty crucial, what? That may be the picture painted by the Tudors, but it is very much open to question. His role on the murder of Henry VI is also uncertain, though less so.

                  Comment

                  • amateur51

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    Much of the research exceeded my comprehension, but I did a search on 'bottle' and couldn't find it in the paper - his intake of fluid varied in the last 2 years of his life and the argument is that this was an increase in wine (along with richer foods). Not sure about him being a 'bottle a day' man ... ?
                    Related to William Hague then, no doubt

                    Comment

                    • Flosshilde
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7988

                      Originally posted by Ockeghem's Razor View Post
                      I see from the BBC news website that the scientists who are examining his remains have found that he 'took to drink' when he became king. This means a bottle of wine a day, it would appear. Jings! What price H. H. 'Perrier Jouet' Asquith or Winston Churchill or any number of 18th century political lushes?
                      According to the news item, "Richard's diet when he was king was far richer than that of other equivalent high status individuals . Surely the monarch doesn't have any 'eqivalent' individuals - they're at the top of the pile?

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30257

                        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                        Surely the monarch doesn't have any 'eqivalent' individuals - they're at the top of the pile?
                        In status and power, yes, but I suppose the king didn't always eat alone on a special 'king's diet' which no one else shared?
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Flosshilde
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7988

                          Louis XIIII did, but he was in a class of his own in most things

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            I am just thinking about what the reburial service of ire-internment will be like.
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • Ockeghem's Razor

                              Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                              I am just thinking about what the reburial service of ire-internment will be like.
                              I no longer subscribe to any belief system but was once an Anglican ordinand of a very Percy Dearmer persuasion and I would hope that it would be liturgically a historically informed performance. That would mean Latin mass of requiem in the Sarum Rite (with appropriate vestments: apparelled amices and albs etc) and music from his time (Dunstaple surely would be considered fitting).

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                                ire-internment
                                Is this like burying the hatchet?
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X