Richard the Third
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI still say York be the best place!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JFLL View PostThis one seems to be going the rounds on the internet
Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 06-02-13, 22:17.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by secret squirrel View PostI don't see why he couldn't be laid to rest there either, but as many others have pointed out
How about the simple 'rainbow' test? If it's York for Yellow in the rhyme, then York it ought (not must) to be!
To be truly tasteless, as the poor man is in bits anyway, why not share him round?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by secret squirrel View PostI don't see why he couldn't be laid to rest there either, but as many others have pointed out and in no particular order here are some spanners looking for some overdue work:
Law of the Land [nearest consecrated ground]
a Catholic Rite [so no Anglican church / cathedral, then]
why not with his Consort / family in W Abbey / Gt George's Windsor (see above)?
should it not be a State funeral [even though he's been laid to rest once already?]
It is all actually quite tricky and there will never be consensus as this is quite a big mystery that's been solved and everyone now wants their piece of it / him - all for very good reasons, I hasten to add.
Apologies to Arancie, who's suggestion I hadn't seen.
Comment
-
-
I think that Leicester Cathedral has got a distinct advantage here, as it is the nearest consecrated ground to where he was found and fits in admirably with the long tradition of those fallen in battle being buried near to where they fell. On the other hand, Leicester Cathedral is not large (the 4th smallest in England) and this is still a King we are talking of so a good case for York Minster perhaps. A State Funeral? Why not?
There are many interested in this for their own purpose and as this is a case of unknown territory, I suggest that the Queen, in consultation with the Prime Minister and all interested parties should have the ultimate choice.
My money remains, for good or ill, on Leicester Cathedral.
By the way, I find this whole thing strangely compelling and moving. By and large, this thread has been an excellent and informed discussion with some very fine contributions and has largely remained free of ill-judged comments and sniping."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by secret squirrel View PostI don't see why he couldn't be laid to rest there either, but as many others have pointed out and in no particular order here are some spanners looking for some overdue work:
Law of the Land [nearest consecrated ground]
a Catholic Rite [so no Anglican church / cathedral, then]
why not with his Consort / family in W Abbey / Gt George's Windsor (see above)?
should it not be a State funeral [even though he's been laid to rest once already?]...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI would agree with that, anna. As he was also Duke of York.
Originally posted by arancie33 View PostThat was another Richard. He died at the battle Wakefield....Last edited by Pabmusic; 06-02-13, 23:35.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostHe was Richard of Gloucester, not Richard of York - that was his father who died at Wakefield.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
'Authoritative online sources' reveal that the nursery rhyme "The grand old Duke of York" and the physics mnemonic "Richard of York gave battle in vain" probably refer to the Richard who fell at the Battle of Wakefield. Though because it doesn't state that he was Duke of York, Richard III and Bosworth stay in the running for the latter.
The nursery rhyme's emphasis on passage up and down the hill apparently well describes the Duke's fatal tactical mistakes in the Wakefield battleI keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Last year I got the BBC Shakespeare DVD set (a snip, by the way, for £70). Having greatly enjoyed Mark Rylance's Richard III last week, I decided to check out the Beeb's version. Ron Cook does a very good job backed by a fine cast and there is much to be gained by getting the bard's the full text. Most adaptations cut quite heavily. I relished Michael Byrne's Buckingham, who kept reminding me of the plausible, duplicitous spin doctors of of our own time.Last edited by gurnemanz; 07-02-13, 22:09.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostTeribly unimaginative lot, the royals, when it comes to naming their children. All these Richards, Georges, Edwards & Henries.
Not much research and I can give the following as the currently most popular names (boy/girl) in the US:
Jacob/Sophia
Mason/Isabella
William*/Emma
Jayden/Olivia
Noah/Ava
*(Obviously because of Prince William, so I'd not allow it.)
I prefer some of these:
Aero/Monalisa
Cello/Shoog
Cobain/Ummi
Haven'T/Juju
Vice/J'Adore
Comment
-
Comment