Playing with trains/ HS2 & 3
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mangerton View PostIs this not to do with relativity? According to Govt. ministers, these trains are going to be so fast that they'll arrive at their destination before they leave.
(Or have I got this wrong?)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostBut the nearer they approach the speed of light, the more everything will slow down. So everyone will complain.
Most of Britain's train tracks are wholy unsuitable for high speed travel and having to start all over again will simply never be affordable. As things are now, however, with the project coming under increasing and increasingly vociferous criticism and opposition, it's looking less and less likely that it will ever begin and it will not surprise me to hear of its having been shunted into the sidings.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View Post...
Most of Britain's train tracks are wholy unsuitable for high speed travel and having to start all over again will simply never be affordable. ....
as the southern part is about to be electrified could not the line as far as Shrewsbury be upgraded (or has it gone beyond reach) then switch to Crewe link and thus increased access to Liverpool + Manchester tho I suspect the bottle neck to Scotland north of Preston will remain - if the SR route ex the new Reading station upgraded then good links to areas south + west of LondonLast edited by Frances_iom; 09-09-13, 15:02.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Frances_iom View Postthe argument seems to have morphed into never mind the speed feel the capacity - there was in distant past a very pleasant GWR route Chester - Shrewsbury- Wolverhamptom- Birmingingham-Oxford-London
as the southern part is about to be electrified could not the line as far as Shrewsbury be upgraded (or has it gone beyond reach) then switch to Crewe link and thus increased access to Liverpool + Manchester tho I suspect the bottle neck to Scotland north of Preston will remain - if the SR route ex the new Reading station upgraded then good links to areas south + west of London
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vile Consort View PostFrankly, it always was about capacity. It's just that the PR people didn't find that sexy enough so they emphasized the speed.
Is it actually all hard pressed execs speeding from Manchester to the Smoke, or is the WCML use much more generally as a long distance local line?(if that makes sense).
If capacity is really an issue, why is the last train to Manchester from Euston at 10pm?
Double decker train not an option?
Improved links from the East/South Coast wherever into Brum not an option?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
on an associated subject...
it looks like some good public transport news at last.
It seems, (though many will believe it when they see it) that the Transwilts service is to be upgraded from the currently useless two trains a day, to a proper regular service.
Really excellent news, assuming all goes to plan.
Well done all concerned.
More like this elsewhere, please!!
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
In my experience (of the ECML) it's not "execs" but (a) ordinary employees like myself being sent to meetings with suppliers and customers, (b) lots of families with children and (c) long distance commuters.
On the way south, few people get off and, on the way north. few get on. It's a means of getting from somewhere to London and back.
Why no trains after 10pm? The meeting attenders are only paid from 9 till 5 and don't want to spend any more time than necessary outside those hours on their employers' business. The families with kids don't want to be travelling late at night for obvious reasons, and the long distance commuters want to leave London as soon as possible after they finish work.
Capacity at a time when nobody wants to travel isn't capacity at all. The railway companies are already doing everything they can to push traffic away from the peak hours by making peak hour travel eye-wateringly expensive and off-peak travel ludicrously cheap but there is still more demand than they can cope with during the peak and lots of spare capacity at the ends of the day.
Double decker trains probably aren't an option because of the restricted UK loading gauge. Maximum height from rail to where the roof begins is only about 13 feet, and there is a considerable amount of equipment to be accommodated below the floor. Unless customers are prepared to enter the carriages on all fours, it is impracticable. Changing the loading gauge would mean large sections of the route being closed for years and years.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
Talking to two business people about just that yesterday. FAR more people live in the Manchester / Liverpool conurbations, plus Preston, many millions in the Leeds / NE areas than Brum. Train change facilities in Manchester are far better than the chaos that is New St Stn The North West is where much of the current big business revival has to happen. By all means route it through Brum, BUT start it from Leeds / Manchester. Totally agree. BUT they would have to do something with Leeds Stn which is frankly a real mess.
Comment
-
Comment