If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
ams, I have no expectations but understand the realities of life and of getting old. I don't relish it. In ten years time I will be 73. I may well go out in a blaze of adventure, fun and lust.
You may laugh, but if I was at home I could supply links to the Economist articles saying that his action was vital in avoiding a global depression.
The "story" of the financial crisis has been written by the Tory party - the victors always write the history. Not that I am saying that there weren't significant mistakes during the Brown era, nevertheless I shudder to imagine what would have happened if Osborn had been Chancellor at that time. While he was Shadow Chancellor, Osborn got every significant call wrong - whether that was just opportunism or bad judgement I have no idea. (Also it is worth remembering that, until the financial crisis, the Tories pledged to match Labour's public spending and continually argued for looser financial regulation!!!)
The "story" of the financial crisis has been written by the Tory party - the victors always write the history. Not that I am saying that there weren't significant mistakes during the Brown era, nevertheless I shudder to imagine what would have happened if Osborn had been Chancellor at that time. While he was Shadow Chancellor, Osborn got every significant call wrong - whether that was just opportunism or bad judgement I have no idea. (Also it is worth remembering that, until the financial crisis, the Tories pledged to match Labour's public spending and continually argued for looser financial regulation!!!)
I wish Cameroon and Gideon got a really bad attack of sciatica every time they mouth their 'history', johnb!
Meanwhile let's not forget that before the crash the Tories were complaining that there was _too_ much regulation in the city.
And they were probably right to some degree, but it was too much regulation of the wrong kind and woefully inadequate monitoring and policing of the effective use of such regulation as there was.
Quoi? When? Where? Why did he sell of so many assets and why did the banking sector get in such a mess if he "saved" it?
And they were probably right to some degree, but it was too much regulation of the wrong kind and woefully inadequate monitoring and policing of the effective use of such regulation as there was.
I wonder if you thought/voiced this at the time, ahinton?
I seem to remember that most people were just jibbering, and at least Gordon & Alistair had a plan and did their best, which was widely praised at the time
I seem to remember that most people were just jibbering, and at least Gordon & Alistair had a plan and did their best, which was widely praised at the time
Exactly. Chief among the headless chickens being the US president.
I seem to remember that most people were just jibbering, and at least Gordon & Alistair had a plan and did their best, which was widely praised at the time
Alistair Darling was no fool but, like all too many ministers that got too close to Brown, he had to do his bidding too often and had his hands at least partially tied behind his back during Brown's Chancellorship and subsequent Prime Ministership, as he has since admitted.
I am not necessarily suggesting that Gideon and Dave would have done a better job of it all - or even that Britain's actions alone in such matters were wholly responsible for what happened - but none of this exonerates GB from responsibility for what he allowed to happen to GB's financial services industry.
Comment