Originally posted by cloughie
View Post
The Future of the BBC
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostSo are you happy to see failure rewarded? -did he resign or was he sacked?
...and as with so many other things in life do we just shrug and pay up?
If you read the Guardian article to which my post N42 provides a link you may read Patten's narrative which makes clear to me that there was a negotiation between the Trustees and Entwistle, in view of the fact that there were different costs attached to resignation or termination of contract; and because they needed his goodwill in order to complete the essential internal enquiries; and because they needed him out.
'Failure' is a black-and-white word for an outcome in a complex situation in a large and multi-layered media organisation. As I've said before above I don't think it's possible to blame Entwistle wholly.
One might admire Entwistle's integrity in resigning, given the extent to which this honourable course of action has gone out of fashion in Government, (The last such resignation I can remember was the Foreign Secretary immediately prior to the Falklands war.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View Post..If resignations of the top people at the BBC and the Trust are going to become the standard procedure whenever there is a serious controversy then it makes a mockery of the independence of the BBC.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Frances_iom View PostThatcher made a mockery of BBC independence years earlier (along with much other damage) - the Hutton Inquiry was like many others (eg Hillsborough) more than lopsided, Tariq Ali had it well described as Alistair Cowley crowing like a cock on top of a dung heap - catch is Murdoch escapes with no punishment for sins of commision rather than in Entwistle's case sins of omission compounded I suspect by some deliberate non transfer of intelligence; I expect Murdoch to try to regain control of BSkyB etc as with friends such as Hunt still in gov and the BBC mired it will not even raise a mention in the country
Comment
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostI think you ask one of those 'Have you stopped beating your wife?' questions.
If you read the Guardian article to which my post N42 provides a link you may read Patten's narrative which makes clear to me that there was a negotiation between the Trustees and Entwistle, in view of the fact that there were different costs attached to resignation or termination of contract; and because they needed his goodwill in order to complete the essential internal enquiries; and because they needed him out.
'Failure' is a black-and-white word for an outcome in a complex situation in a large and multi-layered media organisation. As I've said before above I don't think it's possible to blame Entwistle wholly.
One might admire Entwistle's integrity in resigning, given the extent to which this honourable course of action has gone out of fashion in Government, (The last such resignation I can remember was the Foreign Secretary immediately prior to the Falklands war.)
Comment
-
-
Thanks, aeolium, yes I did mean Carrington, but although I could picture him I couldn't recall the name. He resigned because of the failure of the FO to properly assess the level of Argentine threat.
(Nott was the 'here today, gone tomorrow politician' who walked out of his legendary interview with Paxton on Newsnight.)
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post(Nott was the 'here today, gone tomorrow politician' who walked out of his legendary interview with Paxton on Newsnight.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post(Nott was the 'here today, gone tomorrow politician' who walked out of his legendary interview with Paxton on Newsnight.)
oops, crossposted
Comment
-
-
Paul Sherratt
Comment