Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37591

    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    "t'Pit"??!! Tha's soft, tha is! We 'ad to use us feet to dig 'ole and bite t'coal from t'earth. t'Bosses 'ud club together to offer a prize of sixpence for whoever got t'most coal up in a year. Billy "golden gums" Ormsthwaite won every year for ten years - an' 'e were dead for four of 'em.

    And that's why, in them old days, we'd always keep up morale by reminding ourselves of that wise old saying: The Workers United Will Never Be De-Feeted.

    Comment

    • Pabmusic
      Full Member
      • May 2011
      • 5537

      Originally posted by cloughie View Post
      Do they have a ‘Head of Discontent’ also?
      Surely that's Gloria Summers.

      Comment

      • LMcD
        Full Member
        • Sep 2017
        • 8406

        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
        "t'Pit"??!! Tha's soft, tha is! We 'ad to use us feet to dig 'ole and bite t'coal from t'earth. t'Bosses 'ud club together to offer a prize of sixpence for whoever got t'most coal up in a year. Billy "golden gums" Ormsthwaite won every year for ten years - an' 'e were dead for four of 'em.

        Comment

        • Richard Barrett
          Guest
          • Jan 2016
          • 6259

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          "So what bit of XXXXXXX do you not understand?" meaning you're too thick to understand why I'm right.
          You mean as in "So what bit of 'the precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self)' do you not understand?"

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37591

            Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
            You mean as in "So what bit of 'the precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self)' do you not understand?"
            And that's just the preamble to Lecture 1!

            Comment

            • Lat-Literal
              Guest
              • Aug 2015
              • 6983

              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              "'Ods" LUXURY! We 'ad to scrape the mud to make our own bricks and then carry 'em on us shoulders seventeen mile. An' if it weren't raining, t'gaffer'd turn 'osepipe on us.

              But we were 'appy.
              'appen.

              I was accused many times by a university barmaid in York of "stinking in bed" before lunchtime.

              I liked her but being a precious sort in those days it offended my sensibilities.

              There was a post punk girl there who had a t-shirt which read "whip me, thrill me, shag me" and she was supposedly just fine for being another woman.

              No especial issues here - just difficulties then in general life processing.

              (I never got anywhere but hopefully she is a great grandmother now)
              Last edited by Lat-Literal; 26-09-18, 10:52.

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30241

                Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                You mean as in "So what bit of 'the precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self)' do you not understand?"
                No, you're only allowed 7 letters - XXXXXXX
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • LMcD
                  Full Member
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 8406

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  No, you're only allowed 7 letters - XXXXXXX
                  OK then - Brexit+

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                    OK then - Brexit+
                    Sorry, it does not compute. "+" is a mathematical operator, not a letter.

                    Comment

                    • Pabmusic
                      Full Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 5537

                      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                      Sorry, it does not compute. "+" is a mathematical operator, not a letter.
                      "Brexxit" then?

                      Comment

                      • muzzer
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2013
                        • 1190

                        Am I alone in thinking that the fact there is no agreed pronunciation of Brexit in itself tells you all you need to know about it. Are you an “eggs” or “eks” person? Breggsit means Breksit?

                        Comment

                        • LMcD
                          Full Member
                          • Sep 2017
                          • 8406

                          Originally posted by muzzer View Post
                          Am I alone in thinking that the fact there is no agreed pronunciation of Brexit in itself tells you all you need to know about it. Are you an “eggs” or “eks” person? Breggsit means Breksit?
                          'You Breksit if you want to. Some of us are not for Breksiting'

                          Comment

                          • Pulcinella
                            Host
                            • Feb 2014
                            • 10887

                            Originally posted by muzzer View Post
                            Am I alone in thinking that the fact there is no agreed pronunciation of Brexit in itself tells you all you need to know about it. Are you an “eggs” or “eks” person? Breggsit means Breksit?
                            Are we in danger of putting all our eggs in one Breksit?

                            Comment

                            • Serial_Apologist
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 37591

                              Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                              "Brexxit" then?
                              Can it take double multiplication though?

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by muzzer View Post
                                Am I alone in thinking that the fact there is no agreed pronunciation of Brexit in itself tells you all you need to know about it. Are you an “eggs” or “eks” person? Breggsit means Breksit?
                                Well - isn't it the same with (one of) the root word(s) "Exit"? "Egzit" or "Eksit"?
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X