If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
An example on radio just now gave me a tooth erection and reminded me of what seems to me to be a widespread misuse, particularly among sports commentators (not the best arbiters of good English, it must be said).
They refer to 'not getting the rub of the green' when they seem to be making an excuse for a less than ideal performance.
As I understood, the rub of the green is a term derived from golf, where the rub means an unfortunate deflection resulting in a less than desired result. The opposite, when a fortunate effect gives an unexpectedly better result, is getting 'the run of the green'.
So, logically enough, 'run' is good, 'rub' is bad. Why have so many users latched on to 'rub' instead of 'run'?
[I see some on-line sources are now accepting this meaning, probably as a reflection of the current usage, though all references to the derivation of rub, be they from golf, snooker or bowls, seem to indicate a bad effect, equivalent to 'let or hindrance'.]
Interesting, DP. OED seems to suggest that the key idea is that it's an accidental/unintended effect that can therefore technically be in a player's favour or not. It now seems to be mainly used as being a good thing (which is how I'd always understood it - without knowing much about the origin).
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
During an item on encription on this morning's Today, as a consequence of proposed legislation, an 'expert' used this term to describe what firms like Apple will have to do to their systems.
During an item on encription on this morning's Today, as a consequence of proposed legislation, an 'expert' used this term to describe what firms like Apple will have to do to their systems.
Another useless bit of terminology dreamed up.
Whatever happened to 're-design'?
Quite - especially since an architect is a person whereas it is architecture that is a task and a process (or at the very least the outcome thereof); perhaps Today should have gone farther and interviewed an encryptologist (encryptographer?) on the subject as well...
Completely and absolutely intolerable, that bloke.
Almost makes Waldemar Januszczak seem watchable.
...
Actually, no he doesn't
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
...an architect is a person whereas it is architecture that is a task and a process (or at the very least the outcome thereof)...
But there ought to be a verb as well, oughtn't there?
Oh wait a minute - there is! Or was, at any rate; it looks like one of those that fell out of use and is just lying around, waiting to be revived.
1818 Keats Let. July (1958) I. 350 This was architected thus By the great Oceanus.
1890 Harper's Mag. Apr. 809/2 We would not give being the author of one of Mr. Aldrich's beautiful sonnets to be the author of many ‘Wyndham Towers’, however skilfully architected.
1913 W. Raleigh Some Authors (1923) 3 He has come out of the prison-house of theological system, nobly and grimly architected.
I don't like any of the BBC's so-called "political editors" these days. Not one of them.
True - though Peston has now migrated to ITV News...
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
True - though Peston has now migrated to ITV News...
Then there's Norman Smith, perpetually in the HOC lobby, rubbing his hands in delight at news of some terrible new government dictat. One wonders if his glee is a measure of his own job security.
Comment