Originally posted by teamsaint
View Post
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Don Petter
-
'Our Chief Economics Editor'
'Our Assistant Chief Economics Editor'
'Our Chief Political Correspondent'
'Our Assistant Chief Political Correspondent'
'Our Senior Political Correspondent'
Etc, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.
I suspect 'Our Assistant Chief Team Leader' might not be too far off ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post'Our Chief Economics Editor'
'Our Assistant Chief Economics Editor'
'Our Chief Political Correspondent'
'Our Assistant Chief Political Correspondent'
'Our Senior Political Correspondent'
Etc, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.
I suspect 'Our Assistant Chief Team Leader' might not be too far off ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWhat would your preferences be, then? If that's what each of them is, how do you think that they should instead be described?
What media staff pompously love to call each other 'in house' is only of any real interest to them and the increasingly patronised, easily-impressionable listener, ahinton!
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by jean View PostI like to knw what expertise the person I'm listening to might have.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostIndeed. I'm still not 100% clear on the relative standing of the BBC's Assistant Political Editor and its Deputy Political Editor.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostIndeed. I'm still not 100% clear on the relative standing of the BBC's Assistant Political Editor and its Deputy Political Editor.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post'Reporter'.
What media staff pompously love to call each other 'in house' is only of any real interest to them and the increasingly patronised, easily-impressionable listener, ahinton!Last edited by ahinton; 10-08-15, 09:34.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostSo should I assme that you believe ....
Originally posted by ahinton View Post... that all such staff should be described only as "our reporter"?
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIf so and if indeed the norm determined that they'd be so, it would remind me of a professional colleague who once pronounced upon the perils of getting the football correspondent to write concert and record reviews in local newspapers. Do you not find it acceptable that professional people, including journalists, have specialities? This isn't about "what media staff pompously love to call each other 'in house'"; for one thing, there's no inherent pomposity in any of the descriptors that you mention and, for another, it's not about what an organisation's staff calls other members of its staff but what those other staff members actually are and do. Accordingly, I don't see the problem. If something sets your teeth on edge, would you deny the profession of the dentist whom you consulted about it?
It is only right that a dentist is referred to as a 'dentist' or even a 'dental surgeon'. However if my dentist advertised him/herself as Dr Jones, Assistant Deputy Chief of the Dental Practice Association, I would tend to think he/she might be rather more concerned with advertising his/her supposed "high office" than concentrating on the care of patients' teeth, so I would probably switch to good old plain Mr/Ms Smith, Dentist, across the road, ahinton!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostOh, come off (it), Mr Tippster, don't be so gratuitously patronising...
Comment
-
Comment