Originally posted by P. G. Tipps
View Post
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostI'm not sure of the question
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Postthough I think I know the answer but won't spoil things by letting everyone know
In any case, it's for Beefy himelf to say why.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostThen read the posts from #2031 onwards, from which it should be abundantly clear that the question is why that particular phrase sets Beefy's teeth on edge. Simples..
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIn any case, it's for Beefy himelf to say why.
Originally posted by ahinton View PostThen why bother to post as you have on the subject?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostThen read the posts from #2031 onwards, from which it should be abundantly clear that the question is why that particular phrase sets Beefy's teeth on edge. Simples...
I am a little confused about this. Beefy doesn't like "they cannot be named for legal reasons" (I doubt it's anything to do with the plural pronoun, either). Now this could mean that (1) he doesn't like the phrase, or (2) he objects to the principle.
If it is (2) then that raises a spectre that he might prefer a 'media circus' to surround vulnerable people (perhaps - let's say - a five-year-old). I have a reasonable degree of trust that he doesn't mean this.
If it is just the phrase he doesn't like (maybe because it's formulaic) well, OK. Difficult to see what you might usefully replace it with, though, that wouldn't become just as formulaic. It is., after all, a statement of fact.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI was on a train a couple of days ago which was too long for the platforms at one of the stations it stopped at.
So the announcement was that
"carriage M will not be platformed"
IS that even a word?
Comment
-
Comment