Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    Originally posted by doversoul View Post
    Has anyone ever said that music is a thing?
    We all do it, every time we use the noun 'music'.

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20570

      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
      "Musicking"? Not for me.


      I'll be too busy Arting.
      I don't even like "musicality"

      Comment

      • doversoul1
        Ex Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 7132

        S-A #2025

        I guessed/assumed that was the point of Small’s argument/theory but I wish he had thought about or coined more original or imaginative term. Misicking to me sounds simply lazy use of language, like ‘do’.

        Comment

        • Beef Oven!
          Ex-member
          • Sep 2013
          • 18147

          "They cannot be named for legal reasons"
          Last edited by Beef Oven!; 04-08-15, 21:17. Reason: duplication

          Comment

          • MrGongGong
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 18357

            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
            It is the latter that Small would seek to have restored to music making, or musicking.


            Music, Society, Education is one of the great books about music IMV

            I find the word Musicking very useful in discussing musics that don't fall outside the supposed "mainstream".

            Comment

            • ahinton
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 16122

              Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
              "They cannot be named for legal reasons"
              Any particular reason for that one?

              Comment

              • Pabmusic
                Full Member
                • May 2011
                • 5537

                Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                "They cannot be named for legal reasons"
                I'm not sure what you're on about.

                Do you mean that vulnerable people should be named? Or, if it's just the phrasing you dislike, what alternative would you suggest?

                Comment

                • jean
                  Late member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 7100

                  You'd have thought he'd have been relieved not to have been named, in the circumstances.

                  Comment

                  • P. G. Tipps
                    Full Member
                    • Jun 2014
                    • 2978

                    Originally posted by jean View Post
                    You'd have thought he'd have been relieved not to have been named, in the circumstances.
                    I certainly do not see any automatic gender/numerical connection between 'they' and 'he' whatever the legalities ...

                    Comment

                    • ahinton
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 16122

                      Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                      I certainly do not see any automatic gender/numerical connection between 'they' and 'he' whatever the legalities ...
                      But unless jean's #2033 is intended to suggest otherwise by its reference to "he" (and, if so, it would seem that neither the particular "he" nor the "circumstances" concerned is identified), I'm not sure that this is an issue - or at least the issue - is it? I simply asked Beefy what it is about the phrase that he quoted that sets his teeth on edge and I'm still unclear about that (as presumably is Pabs also).

                      Comment

                      • jean
                        Late member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7100

                        Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                        I certainly do not see any automatic gender/numerical connection between 'they' and 'he' whatever the legalities ...
                        I was referring to Beefy, whose teeth were set on edge by the phrase.

                        I could see no reason for the effect it had on him unless he had at some time been one of those to whom it had been applied - and in that case, wouldn't he have been relieved?

                        Comment

                        • ahinton
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 16122

                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          I was referring to Beefy, whose teeth were set on edge by the phrase.
                          I see; I understand it now.

                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          I could see no reason for the effect it had on him unless he had at some time been one of those to whom it had been applied
                          Nor me.

                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          and in that case, wouldn't he have been relieved?
                          One would certainly assume so!
                          Last edited by ahinton; 05-08-15, 22:11.

                          Comment

                          • teamsaint
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 25193

                            So, super injunctions. Always in the public interest? Although actually I dont think Beefys phrase applies there, but even so....
                            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                            I am not a number, I am a free man.

                            Comment

                            • Beef Oven!
                              Ex-member
                              • Sep 2013
                              • 18147

                              Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                              I'm not sure what you're on about.

                              Do you mean that vulnerable people should be named? Or, if it's just the phrasing you dislike, what alternative would you suggest?
                              "Vulnerable people"

                              Comment

                              • P. G. Tipps
                                Full Member
                                • Jun 2014
                                • 2978

                                Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                                I One would certanily assume so!
                                I once said that to a newly-installed boss of mine, who replied in a similar fashion to .... 'look, monkey-face, to 'assume' anything can often make an 'ass' of 'u' and 'me'.

                                How true, ahinton!

                                The poor chap was summarily dismissed shortly afterwards for being 'unsuitable', allegedly in the area of managing and inspiring subordinates.

                                Funny, he remains one of the few bosses I ever had who's advice to me made any sort of impressionable and lasting impact ...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X