Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sir Velo
    Full Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 3217

    Originally posted by jean View Post
    Strictly speaking, the railway is the whole operation.
    Debat(e)able surely?

    I would say railway comprises () both meanings (i.e. both the actual track and the system) as a quick gander at my Chambers tells me. This point is inferred by the French usage of chemin de fer which encompasses both meanings, as ahinton has kindly demonstrated.

    Comment

    • Nick Armstrong
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 26440

      Originally posted by jean View Post
      (The word tramway/tramwaia in Polish popularly refers not to the track the tram runs on, but to the tramcar itself.)
      As it does in French - although 'le tramway' can also refer to 'the tram system' and well as an actual tramcar.

      'Ligne de tramway' is the phrase for a tram line...



      Originally posted by ahinton View Post
      ...Alkan might have disagreed, though, having named what must surely be one of the first "train" pieces Chemin de fer; I'm reminded also of the middle movement of his Grand Duo for violin and piano (a greatly underappreciated work, even today), titled l'Enfer and am now given to wonder whether, had he witnessed the recent events at Dawlish, he might have thought to combine the ideas in them both into a new piece entitled Chemin d'Enfer...
      Phew.... did anyone else breathe a sigh of relief when that joke finally pulled into the station....?

      "...the isle is full of noises,
      Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
      Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
      Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
        This point is inferred by...
        You did that on purpose, didn't you?

        Comment

        • Sir Velo
          Full Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 3217

          Originally posted by Caliban View Post
          Phew.... did anyone else breathe a sigh of relief when that joke finally pulled into the station....?

          I'm afraid it had me all at sea....

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            Originally posted by Caliban View Post
            ...although 'le tramway' can also refer to 'the tram system' and well as an actual tramcar.
            In Italian, we have examples of its use for a system that no longer exists at all.

            Ferrovie Tramvie Vicentine in the province of Vicenza runs neither trains nor trams, only buses. But it's never bothered to change its name.

            Comment

            • Sir Velo
              Full Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 3217

              Originally posted by jean View Post
              You did that on purpose, didn't you?
              I thought I was siding up to that one quite well....

              Comment

              • ahinton
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 16122

                Originally posted by Don Petter View Post
                While I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments regarding that neologism, one of the words which sets my teeth on edge is 'comprise' used when 'compose' is meant.
                I might have responded to that but am too busy comprising some music.

                Comment

                • Mahler's3rd

                  On signing a new player in the recent transfer window a Premier League manager said in an interview, "of course he's a good player, he's better with the ball than he is without it"..............

                  Just as well I suppose given the fee paid

                  Comment

                  • Don Petter

                    'This point is inferred by...'

                    Originally posted by jean View Post
                    You did that on purpose, didn't you?
                    What are you implying?

                    Comment

                    • Flosshilde
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7988

                      Originally posted by jean View Post
                      Strictly speaking, the railway is the whole operation.

                      If you wanted to talk about the bit the trains actually ran on, you said railway line.
                      Surely 'track' is the correct term (as you suggest later in your post -

                      (The word tramway/tramwaia in Polish popularly refers not to the track the tram runs on, but to the tramcar itself.)
                      )

                      Comment

                      • Bryn
                        Banned
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 24688

                        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                        Surely 'track' is the correct term (as you suggest later in your post -

                        )
                        Surely a railway train runs on rails, which comprise part of the track, the latter also including the ballast, sleepers, etc.

                        Comment

                        • Sir Velo
                          Full Member
                          • Oct 2012
                          • 3217

                          Originally posted by Don Petter View Post
                          'This point is inferred by...'



                          What are you implying?
                          In(fer)red. Elementary really. Glad that's ironed out.

                          Comment

                          • Flosshilde
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 7988

                            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                            Surely a railway train runs on rails, which comprise part of the track, the latter also including the ballast, sleepers, etc.
                            The rails wouldn't be much use without the sleepers, which keep the rails the correct distance apart, and the ballast, which provides cushioning for the weight of the train & keeps the rails level. So the train needs the complete track to run on. If it just ran on the rails it would very quickly go off the rails.

                            Comment

                            • Bryn
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 24688

                              Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                              The rails wouldn't be much use without the sleepers, which keep the rails the correct distance apart, and the ballast, which provides cushioning for the weight of the train & keeps the rails level. So the train needs the complete track to run on. If it just ran on the rails it would very quickly go off the rails.
                              If the train came off the rails (which its wheels run in direct contact with) it would not run too successfully on the other components of the track.

                              Comment

                              • ahinton
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 16122

                                While some of us have been training ourselves to keep track of the topic and others of us railing against it in continuously welded manner, it occurs to me that another absurd phrase that I've heard in station announcements (albeit not one that I've encountered recently so perhaps it's been quietly consigned to the ballast) is "the service now standing at platform × is the twenty-three ten service for..."...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X