have you always gotten annoyed with that, or is it only recently you've gotten annoyed ?
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI get annoyed with the mis-use of 'sat'. Am I correct in thinking 'He was sat next to me' is grammatical incorrect and should be either 'He sat next to me' or 'He was sitting next to me'?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View Posthttp://www.amazon.co.uk/Somethings-G...7s+gotten+hold
...but the song wouldn't be the same without it!
You'd think the excuse would because it was American but the song was written by two Englishmen - Roger Cook and Roger Greenaway.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI get annoyed with the mis-use of 'sat'. Am I correct in thinking 'He was sat next to me' is grammatical incorrect and should be either 'He sat next to me' or 'He was sitting next to me'?
I agree that on the surface it appears ungrammatical but there is a subtle difference between this past participle usage and the more standard present continuous when used with verbs of position.
When the police came in, the murderer was kneeling over the corpse. (Pres continuous: What was he doing at that moment?)
When the police came in, the murderer was knelt over the corpse. (What position was he in?)
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI get annoyed with the mis-use of 'sat'. Am I correct in thinking 'He was sat next to me' is grammatical incorrect and should be either 'He sat next to me' or 'He was sitting next to me'?
Comment
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
I agree that on the surface it appears ungrammatical but there is a subtle difference between this past participle usage and the more standard present continuous when used with verbs of position.
When the police came in, the murderer was kneeling over the corpse. (Pres continuous: What was he doing at that moment?)
When the police came in, the murderer was knelt over the corpse. (What position was he in?)
He was sitting.
He was seated. (Rather than "He was sat." )
I have to say that, like you, the use of "he was sat" doesn't offend me overmuch...
Comment
-
-
This is all most interesting. There is also the archaic spelling of "sat", "sate".
Similarly to "sat/sitting", a few months ago I had this email exchange with a Radio 4 news programme. Names have been removed to protect the guilty.
(A reporter) told us three times in a short report this evening that she was "stood" under a mountain.
Would someone please tell her that this is incorrect English?
Thank you,
mangerton
Within thirty minutes I received this reply from the programme's editor:
I completely agree and have already pointed this out to her!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostIn my experience, it is quite standard with many educated speakers especially from the North of England.
What's interesting is that it has recently become much more common over a wider area. I think it's time to recognise that it's already become an idiom.
(I hope that presenter pays no attention to the programme editor!)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostWell, of course ... the Scots have so much more to be proudful and prideful about ...
(Interesting - I'm using Firefox as a web browser, & it checks the spelling when I type. Being American, it doesn't like me using 's' instead of 'z' in certain words. It doesn't like 'proudful', but likes 'prideful', which suggests that the use of the latter is common enough in the USA to be included in a spellchecker, but the former isn't)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIt's been common in the NW for a very long time (though not, oddly, in Liverpool).
What's interesting is that it has recently become much more common over a wider area. I think it's time to recognise that it's already become an idiom.
(I hope that presenter pays no attention to the programme editor!)
I hope that presenter pays no attention to the programme editor! - Yes, great - let's dumb down the grammar as well as programme content.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI think it's time to recognise that it's already become an idiom - more's the pity.
I hope that presenter pays no attention to the programme editor! - Yes, great - let's dumb down the grammar as well as programme content.
In Scotland, I seen, I done, and I have went are now so common that one might consider that they too have become idiomatic. Should they too become common currency on formal radio?
Disclaimer: That is of course only my opinion. Other opinions may vary, and must of course be respected too.
Comment
-
-
The trend to withdraw using the word 'the' from certain sentences.
Come in-store for the bargains.
I am going to mosque.
Are you coming to church?
Mortgages available in-branch.
I believe that the word 'the' in this context will soon cease to be used in general conversation especially with the widespread use of texting.
Comment
-
Comment