Originally posted by vinteuil
View Post
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostYou should know me by now, amsey ... firm attention to detail whilst blissfully unaware of others' paranoiac political correctness.
I think the existence of your entrenched sexism is well-established for all to read on this Board and those who point it out to you are neither irrational nor deluded
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View PostWe need to workshop this. I can shoe-horn a window in my diary next Thursday.
Yes, it's a new one on me too. Heard it at work yesterday, and asked for a construe. Apparently it means to explore a topic in great detail, or depth.
It frightens me to death to think that people who earn probably six times as much as me are coming up with tripe like that.
Comment
-
-
On R4 earlier this evening I heard an example of history being re-written. I've heard it before, and it's becoming more common.
Reference was made to events during WW2 in "Nazi occupied France". It seems that the allies didn't fight Germany during the war, but the Nazis. I've heard the recording of the egregious N. Chamberlain many times, and he definitely said "Britain is at war with Germany". Closer to home, it was Germany my father joined the RN to fight.
Yes, the Nazis were the ruling party, but we don't (yet at any rate) say that the Conservatives fought Argentina in 1982, or that the Republicans and the Labour party invaded Iraq in 2003.
Comment
-
-
Mandryka
'Going forward'
'Give me a ball-park'
'Head honcho'
'It's not rocket science'
'You're/he's just liike Victor Meldrew'
'I'm not being funny, but...'
'Partner'
'Gay'
'Rumpy-pumpy'
'See the match last night?'
Comment
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostAccording to wiki: "Paranoia [ˌpærəˈnɔɪ.ə] (adjective: paranoid [ˈpærə.nɔɪd]) is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion."
I think the existence of your entrenched sexism is well-established for all to read on this Board and those who point it out to you are neither irrational nor deluded
By the same token your constant and mostly totally irrelevant references to 'gay men' on this forum could well fall into a much more blatantly overt 'sexist' category ... ?
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostCome, come amsey ... if to simply use the term 'female reporter' is to be deemed 'sexist' well I suppose I'll have to plead guilty.
By the same token your constant and mostly totally irrelevant references to 'gay men' on this forum could well fall into a much more blatantly overt 'sexist' category ... ?
I don't think I've ever referred to 'gay men' unless it's been pertinent and how pray might it be deemed sexist?
Comment
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostThe reporter's gender in your example is irrelevant, you're just highlighting an amusing gaffe so why mention that the reporter's a woman, scotty?
I don't think I've ever referred to 'gay men' unless it's been pertinent and how pray might it be deemed sexist?
Deal?
Comment
-
scottycelt
Comment