....am I allowed to say - this thread is a bit of a circus....
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThereafter troves lie buried until the late 20th c. when they are dug up a couple of times in American publications. The OED article was updated in 2022 and seemingly found nothing then from this veritable trove of new examples.
" . . .well, you heard him just now. Perfect trove of information about New York history - dates, names, genealogies."
p 702 paperback ed
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Padraig View PostSerendipity strikes again. I read this an hour ago in Donna Tartt's The Goldfinch, 2013 USA
" . . .well, you heard him just now. Perfect trove of information about New York history - dates, names, genealogies."
p 702 paperback edIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostAmerican again - so, as we know, language usage is very contagious when British people, esp writers/journalists, read and hear so much (more) American culture. We assimilate it very quickly and unwittingly. And I assume much more slowly within the US itself.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post...."trove" is fine....walk on ....
"Russia has all but given up any hope of taking over the Baltic States for the foreseeable future, according to a leaked trove of purported Kremlin documents, as US officials said a long-anticipated Ukrainian counter-offensive could begin as soon as next week"
.
Comment
-
-
....of interest to someone perhaps....https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001kgm7 ....perhaps as a beginning to new research [as in my case]bong ching
Comment
-
-
Unlikable.
Strangely enough () my American spellcheck is "okay" with this word, which I am hearing more and more often on TV and radio these past few months.
Unlike refers to dissimilarity rather than to taste or value judgement. Surely if one is speaking of someone or something one has aversions to, the adjective should be "dislikable"?
Having asked this question I don't find either dislikable or unlikable in my Oxford. The American spellcheck does not accept dislikable, which tells me something!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostUnlikable.
There might be a distinction between 'dislikeable' (ie someone with regard to whom you feel distinct aversion) and 'unlikeable', where the feeling is more neutral (but you don't 'like' them)
Comment
-
Comment