If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Strictly speaking, the railway is the whole operation.
Debat(e)able surely?
I would say railway comprises () both meanings (i.e. both the actual track and the system) as a quick gander at my Chambers tells me. This point is inferred by the French usage of chemin de fer which encompasses both meanings, as ahinton has kindly demonstrated.
...Alkan might have disagreed, though, having named what must surely be one of the first "train" pieces Chemin de fer; I'm reminded also of the middle movement of his Grand Duo for violin and piano (a greatly underappreciated work, even today), titled l'Enfer and am now given to wonder whether, had he witnessed the recent events at Dawlish, he might have thought to combine the ideas in them both into a new piece entitled Chemin d'Enfer...
Phew.... did anyone else breathe a sigh of relief when that joke finally pulled into the station....?
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
While I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments regarding that neologism, one of the words which sets my teeth on edge is 'comprise' used when 'compose' is meant.
I might have responded to that but am too busy comprising some music.
On signing a new player in the recent transfer window a Premier League manager said in an interview, "of course he's a good player, he's better with the ball than he is without it"..............
Surely a railway train runs on rails, which comprise part of the track, the latter also including the ballast, sleepers, etc.
The rails wouldn't be much use without the sleepers, which keep the rails the correct distance apart, and the ballast, which provides cushioning for the weight of the train & keeps the rails level. So the train needs the complete track to run on. If it just ran on the rails it would very quickly go off the rails.
The rails wouldn't be much use without the sleepers, which keep the rails the correct distance apart, and the ballast, which provides cushioning for the weight of the train & keeps the rails level. So the train needs the complete track to run on. If it just ran on the rails it would very quickly go off the rails.
If the train came off the rails (which its wheels run in direct contact with) it would not run too successfully on the other components of the track.
While some of us have been training ourselves to keep track of the topic and others of us railing against it in continuously welded manner, it occurs to me that another absurd phrase that I've heard in station announcements (albeit not one that I've encountered recently so perhaps it's been quietly consigned to the ballast) is "the service now standing at platform × is the twenty-three ten service for..."...
Comment