“Tweeted out”. S/he ‘tweeted out that......’ Superfluous ‘out’ added apparently to draw attention to the tweet, when a tweet necessarily is emitted into the ether. Where else could it go? Also ironic given that twitter largely seems to exist to draw attention to the tweeter. In general I find myself currently more intolerant than usual of those attempting to draw attention to things which are patently irrelevant. But the weather forecast for next week is much better ;)
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LezLee View PostIt’s like when we changed from being passengers to customers and trains started arriving ‘into’ stations.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by muzzer View PostYes! Superfluous ‘into’, as if adding it emphasises the success of the arrival. Where else at the station was the train to be - onto, underneath, beside? And where does this tendency come from?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by muzzer View PostYes! Superfluous ‘into’, as if adding it emphasises the success of the arrival. Where else at the station was the train to be - onto, underneath, beside? And where does this tendency come from?
I suppose it might mark a difference between arriving “at”, eg by bus outside the station, and “into” as the definition suggests. Not that a train ought to arrive anywhere other than “ into”, obviously.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostAnd while we're at it, what was wrong with railway station that it had to be changed to train station? I think that change has crept up on us.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostAnd while we're at it, what was wrong with railway station that it had to be changed to train station? I think that change has crept up on us.
EDIT: Had not seen cloughie's earlier post making the same point. Apologies for the duplication.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostIt's everywhere, including the BBC, perhaps from the US usage (although I don't think they have so many stations left now)? As you say, it crept up on me. Perhaps 'railway station' will be officially declared obsolete in the dictionaries soon.
EDIT: Had not seen cloughie's earlier post making the same point. Apologies for the duplication.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Historian View PostIt's everywhere, including the BBC, perhaps from the US usage (although I don't think they have so many stations left now)? As you say, it crept up on me. Perhaps 'railway station' will be officially declared obsolete in the dictionaries soon.
EDIT: Had not seen cloughie's earlier post making the same point. Apologies for the duplication.
Can't say that train station bothers me.
The trains run on the railway tracks, but the stations are where the trains stop (or arrive into).
Buses (or omnibuses if you prefer) run on the roads, but we don't have road stations for them, just bus or coach stations.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostWould Americans not have had railroad stations?
Can't say that train station bothers me.
The trains run on the railway tracks, but the stations are where the trains stop (or arrive into).
Buses (or omnibuses if you prefer) run on the roads, but we don't have road stations for them, just bus or coach stations.
At least Preston survived .I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment