Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
    Worth starting a new thread, or do these qualify as setting your teeth on edge?
    I think that most, if not all of those have already featured here, Pulcie. (The one I'm not sure about is the "specially composed" one, and I don't fancy going through the 4245 posts this far- astonishing that we've any teeth left! - to find out! And, I'm not sure what's so enamel-threatening about that one?)
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • cloughie
      Full Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 22215

      Originally posted by Wychwood View Post
      "Grow the business"

      Now here's a man who's doing just that: the chief executive of Kraft Heinz, quoted in the FT on Saturday:

      "We believe we are now in a position to drive sustainable top-line growth from a strong pipeline of new product, marketing and whitespace initiatives that are backed by investments in capabilities for brand and category advantage".

      Eh?
      More beans and the rebranding of Salad Cream and messing about with Cadbury products!

      Comment

      • LMcD
        Full Member
        • Sep 2017
        • 8713

        Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
        Not quite on topic, but Matthew Parris in The Times recently requested contributions for dreaded phrases, giving as his nomination:
        Rail replacement bus service in operation.
        There has been some follow-up in The Times Letters.
        Yesterday we had:
        The following piece has been specially composed for the occasion.
        Today we have:
        Your call is important to us
        and
        We are experiencing an exceptionally high volume of calls just now

        (two different letters).

        Worth starting a new thread, or do these qualify as setting your teeth on edge?
        See #4233

        Comment

        • Stanfordian
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 9331

          'It is what it is!'

          and

          'Our call is important to us!' when it's clearly not.

          Comment

          • Pulcinella
            Host
            • Feb 2014
            • 11129

            Originally posted by LMcD View Post
            See #4233
            Oops!


            They are in today's Times though, from two different people (one in Bath, one in Oxford)!
            You should have got in first, as you did here.
            I only dip into this thread occasionally, so hadn't spotted your contribution.

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37877

              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
              I think that one issue around Woke is that there don't seem to be any degrees of it, leading to a danger of its use in rather divisive ways.
              Er - Woking?

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37877

                "Well we are where we are" - usually signalling a recall to so-called "reality" by persons who rarely if ever come up with long-term solutions to anything, while complaining when others do.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30530

                  Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                  woke

                  Not exactly teeth-on-edge - but definitely some discomfort because of its 'wrong' grammar. Maybe I just need to shrug and tell myself that if I ever want to refer to the concept, I can use more words instead
                  My guess is that its survival is in the balance. The article was rewritten in 2017 so the OED obviously thinks it's here to stay. Its origin is African American 'dialect' + grammatical error, and it seems to have been adopted in circumscribed contexts. Just depends whether it trends more widely.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • kernelbogey
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 5808

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    My guess is that its survival is in the balance. The article was rewritten in 2017 so the OED obviously thinks it's here to stay. Its origin is African American 'dialect' + grammatical error, and it seems to have been adopted in circumscribed contexts. Just depends whether it trends more widely.
                    "Cultural appropriation"...?

                    Comment

                    • kernelbogey
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 5808

                      'Up close and personal.'

                      When usually 'close' will do.

                      Comment

                      • edashtav
                        Full Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 3672

                        Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                        'Up close and personal.'

                        When usually 'close' will do.
                        Doesn’t personal add a certain spice to the proximity, reinforcing the message, immeasurably, kernelbogey?

                        Comment

                        • kernelbogey
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 5808

                          Originally posted by edashtav View Post
                          Doesn’t personal add a certain spice to the proximity, reinforcing the message, immeasurably, kernelbogey?
                          If in relation to a person - agreed: but not in the case of an inanimate object. (In the example which I had just read, reliefs from the Acropolis.)
                          Last edited by kernelbogey; 29-08-18, 06:26.

                          Comment

                          • edashtav
                            Full Member
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 3672

                            Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                            If in relation to a person - agreed: but not in the case of an inanimate object. (In the example which I had just read, reliefs from the Acropolis.)
                            Yes, you’ve made an important distinction, kernelbogey.
                            Last edited by kernelbogey; 29-08-18, 06:27.

                            Comment

                            • kernelbogey
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5808

                              Originally posted by edashtav View Post
                              Yes, you’ve made an important distinction, kernelbogey.

                              Also because it is the title of a film which has become a (journaistic) cliche.

                              Comment

                              • HighlandDougie
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 3108

                                "Snowflake": well I know what a snowflake is, as in it falls from the sky in winter, usually when it's cold. But otherwise? It has crept into another thread and, grr, what the hell is it supposed to mean? Something which melts quickly? Just awful. I don't follow this thread as I have no doubt that the horrors it exposes would just enrage me so if it has appeared before, my apologies.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X