Originally posted by Pulcinella
View Post
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
-
-
Originally posted by Wychwood View Post"Grow the business"
Now here's a man who's doing just that: the chief executive of Kraft Heinz, quoted in the FT on Saturday:
"We believe we are now in a position to drive sustainable top-line growth from a strong pipeline of new product, marketing and whitespace initiatives that are backed by investments in capabilities for brand and category advantage".
Eh?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostNot quite on topic, but Matthew Parris in The Times recently requested contributions for dreaded phrases, giving as his nomination:
Rail replacement bus service in operation.
There has been some follow-up in The Times Letters.
Yesterday we had:
The following piece has been specially composed for the occasion.
Today we have:
Your call is important to us
and
We are experiencing an exceptionally high volume of calls just now
(two different letters).
Worth starting a new thread, or do these qualify as setting your teeth on edge?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View Postwoke
Not exactly teeth-on-edge - but definitely some discomfort because of its 'wrong' grammar. Maybe I just need to shrug and tell myself that if I ever want to refer to the concept, I can use more words insteadIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostMy guess is that its survival is in the balance. The article was rewritten in 2017 so the OED obviously thinks it's here to stay. Its origin is African American 'dialect' + grammatical error, and it seems to have been adopted in circumscribed contexts. Just depends whether it trends more widely.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View PostDoesn’t personal add a certain spice to the proximity, reinforcing the message, immeasurably, kernelbogey?Last edited by kernelbogey; 29-08-18, 06:26.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostIf in relation to a person - agreed: but not in the case of an inanimate object. (In the example which I had just read, reliefs from the Acropolis.)Last edited by kernelbogey; 29-08-18, 06:27.
Comment
-
-
"Snowflake": well I know what a snowflake is, as in it falls from the sky in winter, usually when it's cold. But otherwise? It has crept into another thread and, grr, what the hell is it supposed to mean? Something which melts quickly? Just awful. I don't follow this thread as I have no doubt that the horrors it exposes would just enrage me so if it has appeared before, my apologies.
Comment
-
Comment