If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You favour making the word "alternative" redundant?
I would say yes, in agreement with ferney. If there are two options, the choice defined by virtue of their being options would automatically embrace alternativity, I would have thought.
One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".
One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".
... I don't see the problem here : 'option' means 'choice' [Latin optare] - keeping various choices still available/open seems to me to be a valid way of thinking about things.
... I don't see the problem here : 'option' means 'choice' [Latin optare] - keeping various choices still available/open seems to me to be a valid way of thinking about things.
.
I suppose so vints. It just strikes me that to be an option, it has to be open in the first place!
How about the possibility of three or more alternatives? Its etymology notwithstanding, "alternative" now relates to two or more options.
Oh, yes - though, again, as a personal preference, I'd probably just use "options" no matter how many were available, and wouldn't add "alternative" to the sentence.
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
That is because there is a single station serving Heathrow Terminals 1, 2, and 3.
Firstly, Terminal 1 is no more, and secondly, a more correctly grammatical version would be "Terminals 4 and 1, 2 and 3", though "Terminals 4, and 2 and 3" would more acurately reflect the current facts.
Oh, yes - though, again, as a personal preference, I'd probably just use "options" no matter how many were available, and wouldn't add "alternative" to the sentence.
I'd probably use 'alternatives'. But not 'alternates'
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
I happened to be chatting ( on business ) to a Grand Fromage at a very high profile visitor attraction recently, one intimately connected with the armed services. Suffice to say, he wasn't impressed with the nonsense which now surrounds such matters, as routine.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
...a more correctly grammatical version would be "Terminals 4 and 1, 2 and 3".
... a nice demonstration of the benefits of the oxford comma. The formulation above would seem to imply that there are two stations : one serving terminals 4 and 1, the other serving terminals 2 and 3.
Whereas with the oxford comma - "Terminals 4 and 1, 2, and 3" it is perhaps a little clearer that we are talking about a station serving terminal 4, and another serving terminals 1, 2, and 3.
Comment