Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostYou favour making the word "alternative" redundant?
One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I don't see the problem here : 'option' means 'choice' [Latin optare] - keeping various choices still available/open seems to me to be a valid way of thinking about things.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostNot exactly - I just think that it's already redundant (or, at least, unnecessary)in the phrase "two alternative options".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostHow about the possibility of three or more alternatives? Its etymology notwithstanding, "alternative" now relates to two or more options.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by subcontrabassThat is because there is a single station serving Heathrow Terminals 1, 2, and 3.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOh, yes - though, again, as a personal preference, I'd probably just use "options" no matter how many were available, and wouldn't add "alternative" to the sentence.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostSee it, say it, sorted.
The catch phrase encouraging reporting suspicous items on a train.
The fond hope of the power of aliteration defeated by the banality of the ideas.
And that 'sorted'.....
and useless.
Here's something to put your mind at rest, no honestly, if you happen to find yourself in a crowded space .
I happened to be chatting ( on business ) to a Grand Fromage at a very high profile visitor attraction recently, one intimately connected with the armed services. Suffice to say, he wasn't impressed with the nonsense which now surrounds such matters, as routine.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
.
Originally posted by Bryn View Post...a more correctly grammatical version would be "Terminals 4 and 1, 2 and 3".
Whereas with the oxford comma - "Terminals 4 and 1, 2, and 3" it is perhaps a little clearer that we are talking about a station serving terminal 4, and another serving terminals 1, 2, and 3.
.
Comment
-
Comment