Phrases/words that set your teeth on edge.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37591

    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    Yes - but in that example, I'd keep the "two" and drop the "alternative".

    Comment

    • Lat-Literal
      Guest
      • Aug 2015
      • 6983

      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
      Yes - but in that example, I'd keep the "two" and drop the "alternative".
      You favour making the word "alternative" redundant?

      Comment

      • Serial_Apologist
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 37591

        Originally posted by Lat-Literal View Post
        You favour making the word "alternative" redundant?
        I would say yes, in agreement with ferney. If there are two options, the choice defined by virtue of their being options would automatically embrace alternativity, I would have thought.

        One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".

        Comment

        • vinteuil
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 12788

          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

          One quibble I have over the use of "options" is the superfluous use of "keeping open" in association, as when politicians (typically) say, "Well, we're keeping that option open". This is surely tautological, since the openness is surely explicit in the option, (or options, if there are more than one). One cannot "keep an option closed" because it ceases to be, or was never, an option, though one can of course close an option; therefore one should dispense with the superfluous "open": eg "well, we're keeping that option".
          ... I don't see the problem here : 'option' means 'choice' [Latin optare] - keeping various choices still available/open seems to me to be a valid way of thinking about things.

          .

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37591

            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
            ... I don't see the problem here : 'option' means 'choice' [Latin optare] - keeping various choices still available/open seems to me to be a valid way of thinking about things.

            .
            I suppose so vints. It just strikes me that to be an option, it has to be open in the first place!

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              Originally posted by Lat-Literal View Post
              You favour making the word "alternative" redundant?
              Not exactly - I just think that it's already redundant (or, at least, unnecessary)in the phrase "two alternative options".
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • LMcD
                Full Member
                • Sep 2017
                • 8406

                'The two sides are equal'

                Comment

                • kernelbogey
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 5735

                  See it, say it, sorted.

                  The catch phrase encouraging reporting suspicous items on a train.

                  The fond hope of the power of aliteration defeated by the banality of the ideas.

                  And that 'sorted'.....

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    Not exactly - I just think that it's already redundant (or, at least, unnecessary)in the phrase "two alternative options".
                    How about the possibility of three or more alternatives? Its etymology notwithstanding, "alternative" now relates to two or more options.

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      In the Piccadilly Line, "Terminals 4 and 123".

                      Just to be clear, the enunciation is not as in "one to three", but "one two three".

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                        How about the possibility of three or more alternatives? Its etymology notwithstanding, "alternative" now relates to two or more options.
                        Oh, yes - though, again, as a personal preference, I'd probably just use "options" no matter how many were available, and wouldn't add "alternative" to the sentence.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          Originally posted by subcontrabass
                          That is because there is a single station serving Heathrow Terminals 1, 2, and 3.
                          Firstly, Terminal 1 is no more, and secondly, a more correctly grammatical version would be "Terminals 4 and 1, 2 and 3", though "Terminals 4, and 2 and 3" would more acurately reflect the current facts.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30243

                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                            Oh, yes - though, again, as a personal preference, I'd probably just use "options" no matter how many were available, and wouldn't add "alternative" to the sentence.
                            I'd probably use 'alternatives'. But not 'alternates'
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • teamsaint
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 25193

                              Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                              See it, say it, sorted.

                              The catch phrase encouraging reporting suspicous items on a train.

                              The fond hope of the power of aliteration defeated by the banality of the ideas.

                              And that 'sorted'.....
                              Awful.

                              and useless.

                              Here's something to put your mind at rest, no honestly, if you happen to find yourself in a crowded space .



                              I happened to be chatting ( on business ) to a Grand Fromage at a very high profile visitor attraction recently, one intimately connected with the armed services. Suffice to say, he wasn't impressed with the nonsense which now surrounds such matters, as routine.
                              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                              I am not a number, I am a free man.

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12788

                                .

                                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                                ...a more correctly grammatical version would be "Terminals 4 and 1, 2 and 3".
                                ... a nice demonstration of the benefits of the oxford comma. The formulation above would seem to imply that there are two stations : one serving terminals 4 and 1, the other serving terminals 2 and 3.

                                Whereas with the oxford comma - "Terminals 4 and 1, 2, and 3" it is perhaps a little clearer that we are talking about a station serving terminal 4, and another serving terminals 1, 2, and 3.

                                .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X