If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"Trust me to protect the NHS, says Cameron." (Front page headline today)
It rather depends on how it's said, doesn't it? I can't get Laurel & Hardy out of my mind: "Doh! - trust me to protect the NHS, Ollie…" [scratches head] "Yes, Stanley, we're supposed to dismantle it" [gives the look; piccolos start playing].
It rather depends on how it's said, doesn't it? I can't get Laurel & Hardy out of my mind: "Doh! - trust me to protect the NHS, Ollie…" [scratches head] "Yes, Stanley, we're supposed to dismantle it" [gives the look; piccolos start playing].
Yes, it's all a matter of emphasis, as I can't help thinking when I see the slogan on our local water company vans: 'Making water work!'
"None of these ideas are any good but if we throw them together as part of a
“package”, at least it will look as if we are trying." (See also toolkit)
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
In the world of British football we no longer have a 'team' of players we have a 'group'. Liverpool Brendan Rodgers is one of the worst for foisting this outrage on the traditional football fan.
Doubtless, like-minded colleagues and I will be talking about it tomorrow, or rather, "having conversations, going forward".
Oh indeed. I followed Caliban's link, and it's really too true to be funny. Whoever started "going forward" should have been shot at birth. I hear it almost every day, mostly from airheads who haven't two brain cells to rub together. They're the sort of people who affect poses, oblivious of the effect that has on others - and who, oddly enough, commonly misuse and confuse these two words.
They're the sort of people who affect poses, oblivious of the effect that has on others - and who, oddly enough, commonly misuse and confuse these two words.
Hear hear mangerton! A few years ago the corporate goons at the top of my workplace produced - at high cost - a glossy pamphlet entitled "Getting It Write", ostensibly to construct a corporate "style" and to "correct" "common" "errors" in written communication perpetrated by its employees. This worthless rag was littered with syntactical and grammatical schoolboy mistakes and just sheer bullsh1t. One example which sticks with me was a confusion between "inquiry" and "enquiry".
I sent the pamphlet back directly to the Chief Executive who had commissioned it, with all errors that I could find highlighted. There were at least one hundred that I could find in a 30 page publication. I am sure there were many more that I did not spot.
The booklet itself had a very short shelf life and was hastily and silently withdrawn, never to be mentioned again, as many, many disgruntled fellow employees felt the same way as I did about it.
I will of course name and shame the organisation upon PM request.
Someone on Newsnight has just referred to the "least worst option". This can be heard quite often. Is this now accepted usage despite being ungrammatical? Or does it come under jokey deliberate misuse. Surely "least bad" is what they mean.
Comment