I've been thinking for years that Stamp Duty is a bad way of taxing people. I'm not against taxing the better off, but I'm against Stamp Duty as it presents a strong barrier to mobility. Maybe others will disagree. I think the days have long gone when hardly anyone paid Stamp Duty, and the fact that it often increases each time one upgrades is not helpful.
I don't suppose HMG or HMRC really care, but I do think that if Stamp Duty were abolished, or at least reduced very considerably to a flat rate rate or small percentage, then people would be much more inclined to move. This would then have benefits to various parts of the economy which relate to house relocation, and probably also to refurbishing etc., so in terms of stimulating economic activity that could be much more beneficial than the direct revenue to the Exchequer from Stamp Duty, and the government would still get revenue via other routes.
Maybe I'm wrong. If so, argue against me!
I don't suppose HMG or HMRC really care, but I do think that if Stamp Duty were abolished, or at least reduced very considerably to a flat rate rate or small percentage, then people would be much more inclined to move. This would then have benefits to various parts of the economy which relate to house relocation, and probably also to refurbishing etc., so in terms of stimulating economic activity that could be much more beneficial than the direct revenue to the Exchequer from Stamp Duty, and the government would still get revenue via other routes.
Maybe I'm wrong. If so, argue against me!
Comment