Originally posted by Russ
View Post
Who will the next DG be ?
Collapse
X
-
scottycelt
-
Amazing how quickly Wiki is updated... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Ha..._of_Birkenhead"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Lateralthinking1
Originally posted by Caliban View PostAmazing how quickly Wiki is updated... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Ha..._of_Birkenhead
(Added later - Since I wrote, it has been removed).
This choice, now that it has been made, looks obvious*. Why wasn't he mentioned when 15 or 20 names were discussed, and also mentioned by the bookies, last time?
(*As in neither right nor wrong - just obvious!)Last edited by Guest; 22-11-12, 13:22.
Comment
-
By bad luck, managed to catch the Chairman and the new DG banging on this afternoon, on 5 live. (interrupted the sports news too !)
What a load of twaddle.
I wonder how much these folks would care about the BBC and its core values, and it's world class this that and the other if they were on £50k a year?
The experts (!) are deeply impressed with his transformation of the ROH. I can't honestly see what relevance this has to the important business of transmitting the news to a country that is battling recession, as well being subject to corruption at what seems to be every level of public life, but there you are.
Another day at the office.Last edited by teamsaint; 22-11-12, 18:34.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by french frank View PostDid we ever know who was on the short-list?
It could be argued that given the urgency to appoint and the list of likely runners & riders for a re-run of the event that came up with George Entwistle, a different approach was needed. But I think we should be told.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostWas there one? Did Hall apply or was he given an interview (lunch) & offered the job?
It could be argued that given the urgency to appoint and the list of likely runners & riders for a re-run of the event that came up with George Entwistle, a different approach was needed. But I think we should be told.
But the new regime is going to be big on creativity. Honest.....I heard them say it...:rolleyes:
Edit..I f we wanted a short list, we do seem to have got one...I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostWas there one? Did Hall apply or was he given an interview (lunch) & offered the job?
It could be argued that given the urgency to appoint and the list of likely runners & riders for a re-run of the event that came up with George Entwistle, a different approach was needed. But I think we should be told.
I suppose not opening the process all over again made a saving in licence fee payers' money ... . My guess is 'they wanted him last time', he wasn't available and now he is. So they sat round the table and decided that as he would have been their first choice last time it has all worked out jolly well.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by french frank View PostGiven there were some demands last time that there should be more transparency over the process, it looks like a rude gesture from the Trust. I know there was a Trust meeting today but hadn't heard that there was going to be an announcement today.
I suppose not opening the process all over again made a saving in licence fee payers' money ... . My guess is 'they wanted him last time', he wasn't available and now he is. So they sat round the table and decided that as he would have been their first choice last time it has all worked out jolly well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View Post'cept I know it set your teeth on edgeIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostMy guess is 'they wanted him last time', he wasn't available and now he is. So they sat round the table and decided that as he would have been their first choice last time it has all worked out jolly well.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Oddball View PostI tend to a more Machiavellian jaundiced view of these proceedings - that is maybe George Entwistle was the fall guy.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
"If you appoint the outstanding candidate it does seem that arguments about the process are somewhat by and by." (Ld Patten)
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment