Plebs 1 Toffs 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahinton
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 16123

    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
    Thanks helio.

    AH will be back with the follow-up: how do we get from here to there? Be sure of that!

    G'night all!
    Really? OK, then, if you must.

    ISIHAC.

    Or, for those unfamiliar with that acronym, I'm sorry, I haven't a clue.

    Will that do for you?!

    Comment

    • teamsaint
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 25235

      Originally posted by ahinton View Post
      All together now: OF COURSE NOT!!!


      All together now: OF COURSE NOT!!!
      Have a good trip.
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

      I am not a number, I am a free man.

      Comment

      • teamsaint
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 25235

        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
        Do you prefer the soft centres or the hard centres?
        either, but particularly the toffs !!
        (had to work a bit on that !)
        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

        I am not a number, I am a free man.

        Comment

        • An_Inspector_Calls

          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
          The planned economy concept that has been raised on this thread could do away with investment in the market place by setting up its own fund. The planned economy would do away with all the vagaries, winners and losers, and all the concomitant degradations of spirit and motivation to do with purchasing product with inbuilt obsolescence and instability of value based on gambling schemes out of which todays turbocharged capitalism creates, perpetuates and widens the rich/poor divide. I believe such measures would garner massive popular support, including from those presently ineluctably implicated by virtue of financial schemes being beyond means of control, their own or, ultimately, anyone else's.



          My point is that the market disproportionately benefits those whose manipulations of it disproportionately determine the outcomes of everyone else.
          What a splendid idea, I'm surprised no one has tried it before.

          Presumably this fund would be administered by a committee of the highest integrity and intellect, such as Brother Teamsaint, Brother Heliocentric and your good self, Brother Serial Apologist. That's a committee of perhaps two people. Brother Heliocentric can supply all the big words for those occasional moral-boosting pamphlets you'll need to publish. I'd have Brother Mark Serwotka along as political advisor or even Treasurer.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30537

            I hope we shall get back to a discussion of the political ideas - argument rather than sarcasm. I think of that as being more productive.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • eighthobstruction
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 6452

              Yep ff, playing the (Comrade) Brother Mark Serwotka card was the last low blow....
              bong ching

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37887

                Originally posted by An_Inspector_Calls View Post
                Presumably this fund would be administered by a committee of the highest integrity and intellect, such as Brother Teamsaint, Brother Heliocentric and your good self, Brother Serial Apologist.
                Nah - I'd expect that Brothers would have been excommunicated by order of the Commisariat of Re-nemanclaturisation for Gender Equality by that stage...

                argument rather than sarcasm

                Comment

                • An_Inspector_Calls

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  I hope we shall get back to a discussion of the political ideas - argument rather than sarcasm. I think of that as being more productive.
                  Removal of sarcasm will not suffice; it seems all posts have to be left of centre if they're to be considered politely by others.

                  Comment

                  • heliocentric

                    Originally posted by An_Inspector_Calls View Post
                    it seems all posts have to be left of centre if they're to be considered politely by others.
                    No, they just have to not contain gratuitous sniping at others. Where is this "centre" anyway?

                    Comment

                    • An_Inspector_Calls

                      Originally posted by heliocentric View Post
                      No, they just have to not contain gratuitous sniping at others. Where is this "centre" anyway?
                      A good question. Apparently questioning the role of the police in the resignation by a Tory whip is right wing - seems strange to me. Perhaps you can help us out?

                      Comment

                      • heliocentric

                        Originally posted by An_Inspector_Calls View Post
                        A good question. Apparently questioning the role of the police in the resignation by a Tory whip is right wing - seems strange to me. Perhaps you can help us out?
                        Don't ask me, I never use the terms "right wing" and "left wing".

                        However, to be precise, you didn't "question the role of the police". You accused the officers in question, without any evidence whatsoever, of having "concocted a pack of lies which they released to the press because they wanted to attack the government over their pension cuts".
                        Last edited by Guest; 24-10-12, 19:55.

                        Comment

                        • teamsaint
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 25235

                          Just got in from a very long day on the road,( well mostly off it as the motor broke down) to discover that , if the hard working whitehall mandarin bank poodles want us all to work for out meagre OA pension(if we ever get there)...or in fact want to abolish retirement, which is what it boils down to.

                          Retired people could be encouraged to do community work or face losing some of their pension, suggests an influential crossbench peer.

                          One day the people of this country will decide that enough is enough.

                          Incidentally, which bright spark at R3 decided to progamme what seems to be about a month of Wagner at going home time?
                          I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                          I am not a number, I am a free man.

                          Comment

                          • Petrushka
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 12346

                            Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                            One day the people of this country will decide that enough is enough.
                            I wonder how bad things will have to get before that happens. My own final salary company pension will be closed in January but, naturally, the company directors and managers get to keep theirs. The whole thing has been greeted with a show of resigned apathy by most but with 7 years to go before retirement this sort of thing does no good at all to my already high BP.
                            "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                            Comment

                            • heliocentric

                              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                              or in fact want to abolish retirement, which is what it boils down to.
                              Every time you think the rain of insults is slowing down slightly, along comes another one from another direction. These people must really think they've got their hands nicely on the reins now; I know Bichard served under both Tory and Labour governments but there's something malodorous about his happening to raise this idea at a time when a Tory government is mounting a concerted attack on ordinary people and their expectations. What's that Sooty? It's a coalition government? Well, being a glove puppet yourself I imagine you would know all about the role of the Lib Dems.

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20576

                                Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                                ...want us all to work for out meagre OA pension(if we ever get there)...or in fact want to abolish retirement, which is what it boils down to.
                                That does seem to be the basic plan - kill off the old people before they get old by making them work when their health is simply not up to it.

                                ..Aided and abetted by Lord Hutton who did a U-turn over his previous pension reforms in order to gain another 30 pieces of silver - from his political opponents..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X