Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
George Whitmore Has Died - George Who?
Collapse
X
-
a former acquaintance of mine, who had lived and worked in Saudi Arabia for a number of years, was convinced that the threat of severe punishment was a deterrent to committing crime. She gave as an example jewellers shops in that country, where she said there was no need for a shopkeeper to lock away valuable items or have elaborate security because it was generally understood that a thief would have his hand chopped off, thus no-one was ever tempted.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by mercia View Posta former acquaintance of mine, who had lived and worked in Saudi Arabia for a number of years, was convinced that the threat of severe punishment was a deterrent to committing crime. She gave as an example jewellers shops in that country, where she said there was no need for a shopkeeper to lock away valuable items or have elaborate security because it was generally understood that a thief would have his hand chopped off, thus no-one was ever tempted.
Comment
-
scottycelt
I dont think I'm very far removed from ferney's well-argued and considered opinion on the matter. I understand and respect his stated position completely. I go along with the danger that the use of capital punishment can send a signal that the State is on a similar moral ground to the perpretator, even though I think that particular charge is highly contestible. Capital punishment also strikes me as somewhat contradicting the Christian idea of 'redemption'. Then again, if the only way to reduce child-murder and sex-murders in general were to introduce it then it might well be the lesser of evils to do so? Not a happy choice, but a possibly real and stark choice, nonetheless. There can be unthinking knee-jerk reactions on both sides of the argument?
Here we have the basic difference ... one is morally against it (death-penalty) in any circumstances, the other is currently against it, but is not quite prepared to go that far. This has certain similarities with the arguments over war and whether taking an outright pacifist approach is morally superior to killing a fellow human-being even in what is considered by most to be a just cause . Difficult, difficult questions which have divided decent people since the beginning.
However, I remain opposed to the idea of capital punishment mainly because there is no evidence that ii would work and therefore I consider it could be the greater evil, even before the dreadful likelihood of wrongful convictions are also taken into account. It is also true, as already has been suggested, that some convicted killers are on record as saying they would prefer to be executed than face a lifetime in jail.
One might say when it comes to the death-penalty for certain horrific crimes I might consider myself to be an 'atheist' possibly bordering on the 'agnostic' ... and, in truth, maybe even an amoralist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostThen again, if the only way to reduce child-murder and sex-murders in general were to introduce it then it might well be the lesser of evils to do so?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI think the key word here is "if", scotty; I'm not at all sure the prospect of a death penalty is any kind of deterrent to the kind of psychopath who commits such unspeakably horrendous crimes; the "moral bypass" of their personalities makes them impervious to any such considerations. You're absolutely right: these are uncomfortably difficult cases to contemplate, and very different from the case of Mr Whitmore where the state was very clearly very wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View Post...However, I remain opposed to the idea of capital punishment mainly because there is no evidence that ii would work and therefore I consider it could be the greater evil, even before the dreadful likelihood of wrongful convictions are also taken into account. It is also true, as already has been suggested, that some convicted killers are on record as saying they would prefer to be executed than face a lifetime in jail...
None of these, with the (possible) exception of the USA, is a country we look to for guidance on how to organise society. I do not wish to be lumped with them over capital punishment. Nor is there any evidence that their societies are safer, or more desirable, because they use it. We have one of the lowest homicide rates on the planet (as do the other European countries), lower than in any of these 21 countries.
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post...I'm not at all sure the prospect of a death penalty is any kind of deterrent to the kind of psychopath who commits such unspeakably horrendous crimes; the "moral bypass" of their personalities makes them impervious to any such considerations. You're absolutely right: these are uncomfortably difficult cases to contemplate, and very different from the case of Mr Whitmore where the state was very clearly very wrong.
Originally posted by scottycelt View Post...Then again, if the only way to reduce child-murder and sex-murders in general were to introduce it then it might well be the lesser of evils to do so? Not a happy choice, but a possibly real and stark choice, nonetheless. There can be unthinking knee-jerk reactions on both sides of the argument?
On average, about 11 children a year are killed by strangers, and this includes killings by other children. The number killed by 'perverts' is lower. This doesn't lessen the individual tragedy, of course, but it should stop us regarding it as an epidemic that's out of control.
Capital punishment is a complete red herring. Those who are minded to, blame any crime phenomenon on the absence of capital punishment. If only... What this really means is that we don't have to do anything in the real world, since the solution is so obvious and we're not prepared to adopt it. So it's our fault, really.Last edited by Pabmusic; 15-10-12, 05:26.
Comment
-
Comment