Originally posted by subcontrabass
View Post
Is Michael Gove as dangerous as he sounds?
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
Two interesting pieces from today's Education Guardian, the first by Peter Wilby which looks at the ideological basis for free schools and at similar schemes in Sweden which concludes that:
"The IEA report – which bizarrely compares allowing profit-making companies to run schools to giving votes to women – demands to know why "those who oppose the profit motive" believe that it will "always" lead to inferior results. I for one believe no such thing but the evidence, from developed countries, is that it mostly leads to something that is either worse or no better than the state provides"
Rightwing thinkers are keen for free schools to be allowed to make money, says Peter Wilby, but there is little evidence that this would improve children's education
The second is a fun piece by Michelle Hanson looking at Gove's 'ideas'
After free bibles, the return of O-levels and free schools, now the education secretary wants to let any old know-all become a teacher
Read and weep
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostBut would he be able to find his way there?
Comment
-
-
Lateralthinking1
The current standard of education is quite poor.
It is though way too high for the few jobs that will be available throughout the next 60 years.
Michael Gove is nature's way of restoring equilibrium.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View PostThe current standard of education is quite poor.
The standards of newly qualified teachers is probably higher than it has ever been. When I qualified, you could get though your PGCE year just by turning up.Not so now, when the standards are so much more exacting.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostBut would he be able to find his way there?
(which, come to think of it, is much the same approach that he takes to education policy)
Comment
-
Comment