Originally posted by eighthobstruction
View Post
Annoying R3 Trailers
Collapse
X
-
Etymologically speaking, I think 'promo' is more appropriate, as it implies moving forward ('pro - motion') to the full-length programme. But I'm beginning to sound like Margo in 'The Good Life' who imitated the Christmas Cracker by saying 'crack!' instead of 'bang!' '...because crack is the stem of cracker'.
Maybe we should have a thread on 'conversation-stopping remarks'.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostEtymologically speaking, I think 'promo' is more appropriate, as it implies moving forward ('pro - motion') to the full-length programme. But I'm beginning to sound like Margo in 'The Good Life' who imitated the Christmas Cracker by saying 'crack!' instead of 'bang!' '...because crack is the stem of cracker'.
Maybe we should have a thread on 'conversation-stopping remarks'.
I ought to write a book on this but no one would buy it. There are so many TV jargon terms that a lot of the better run programmes run a multi page glossary for new people . Believe it or not the terms for the same thing vary across different places because people insist on using the brand name for a device rather than what it does . So what is an Aston in one place is chyron (that’s going back a bit) in another. This is the device that puts a caption on a picture.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostEtymologically speaking, I think 'promo' is more appropriate, as it implies moving forward ('pro - motion') to the full-length programme. But I'm beginning to sound like Margo in 'The Good Life' who imitated the Christmas Cracker by saying 'crack!' instead of 'bang!' '...because crack is the stem of cracker'.
Maybe we should have a thread on 'conversation-stopping remarks'.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
BBC uses promo and trailer apparemment (or did - that was 2017):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-38919482
In a competitive environment it’s amazing how the trivial takes on a life of its own.
But there are very many areas I didn’t work in and it’s perfectly possible that others use different terms .
Incidentally there were a lot of people in the Beeb who thought those anti -English rugby trails a big mistake esp the fee fi fo fum one which seemed to encourage on pitch violence.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostThat piece would have probably been writing by an online journalist not a tv or radio producer .It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
Not unlike newpapers, especially regional ones, where press releases from anyone and everyone get published virtually unaltered for reasons of time and filling space.
A friend who works as a press officer for a conservation charity told me that he really sharpened his writing skills when he realised (about ten years ago) that his releases were going verbatim into the local paper. I reckon there are now 10 to 20 press / comms people for every journalist job in the West / South West now. “ They think it’s all over …” yep that was local papers…
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
Could do with more of that across the board!
Comment
-
-
Remember Andy Kershaw, late of this parish, who in his brief stint as R3 used to introduce the then presenter read trails as 'now for the parish news' - personally I now tune in only for the programs I want to hear, 2-3 minutes of trail in the hour remove a lot of my enjoyment - the one trail I could willingly 'kill for' is the one often dropped in after the Bach before 7 section as I use it as a weekday alarm and wish to hear the brief news summary but my radio alarm has no mute; the new trend now especially on R4 is to dress up a trail as a faux news item - degrades the program and makes usually turn off.
Comment
-
-
Yes, the BBC have been 'advertising' for years, despite their supposed ban, and many a 'news item' has really been a plug for a forthcoming BBC programme. They also quite shamelessly plug commercial projects such as theatre productions and book publications under the guise of 'news'. I imagine publishers ahd agents go in for quite a bit of lobbying to bring this about.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI imagine publishers ahd agents go in for quite a bit of lobbying to bring this about.
So my suggestion was that they should have special five-minute announcement programmes at fixed times when they gave out all the programme news, and people who wanted to hear them would make a point of listening, just as they made an 'appointment' to hear specific programmes. That got short shrift: not good marketing practice, Catch the blighters out as often as possible even if you enrage them so much they refuse to listen on principle.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
Jostling, even. They send out free copies, recordings &c in order to attract attention, get more coverage and make more sales. But the BBC either reviews/plays them or it doesn't. They won't do either if they haven't heard about them first. What I disliked was the practice of slipping trails and promotional announcements in unexpectedly to catch people out if they thought they would try to avoid them. The whole point of trails is to hit people's ears, by hook or by crook.
So my suggestion was that they should have special five-minute announcement programmes at fixed times when they gave out all the programme news, and people who wanted to hear them would make a point of listening, just as they made an 'appointment' to hear specific programmes. That got short shrift: not good marketing practice, Catch the blighters out as often as possible even if you enrage them so much they refuse to listen on principle.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
Yet another example of capitalist realism!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment