Annoying R3 Trailers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Old Grumpy
    Full Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 3619

    Heartily sick of all R3 trails, but especially KD's "can you beat Beethoven" trail.


    OG

    Comment

    • ardcarp
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 11102

      TV trails are much worse though. If you look at a typical trail e.g. for BBC1's Win the Wilderness - Alaska [total ****] the shot changes about once each second. According to a friend of mine (retired consultant) this rate of change wold have been completely incomprehensible 50 years ago. So something has happened to our brains that can focus and get some meaning from multiple one-second screen shots. Not surprising many youngsters have a short attention span. Mind you, it was also the case that in the late 19th century when 'moving pictures' were first seen, people could not understand a shot of just head-and-shoulders. It was as if there wasn't a real person there unless the whole body was shown moving (And this despite a long history of head and shoulders busts and portraiture.) So change happens.

      R3 trails? Annoying yes, but not yet mind-blowing.....yet.

      Comment

      • Serial_Apologist
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 37710

        Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
        TV trails are much worse though. If you look at a typical trail e.g. for BBC1's Win the Wilderness - Alaska [total ****] the shot changes about once each second. According to a friend of mine (retired consultant) this rate of change wold have been completely incomprehensible 50 years ago. So something has happened to our brains that can focus and get some meaning from multiple one-second screen shots. Not surprising many youngsters have a short attention span. Mind you, it was also the case that in the late 19th century when 'moving pictures' were first seen, people could not understand a shot of just head-and-shoulders. It was as if there wasn't a real person there unless the whole body was shown moving (And this despite a long history of head and shoulders busts and portraiture.) So change happens.

        R3 trails? Annoying yes, but not yet mind-blowing.....yet.
        Not in my case!!!

        Comment

        • Kernow Malc
          Full Member
          • Oct 2018
          • 56

          I turned the breakfast show on this morning; the first things I heard were the twitter address and the start of a trailer - needless to say the radio went straight off again. I've pretty well reached the point where the station will not be switched on at all.....

          Comment

          • Frances_iom
            Full Member
            • Mar 2007
            • 2413

            Actually I now listen less and less to R3, not only do we get 2mins minimum of trails per hour (obviously way to go to match the USA 10-12mins) with at least 1 after every program often squeezed in such that the dying chords of one piece are immediately succeeded by a jarring advert but there are now 'product placements' in many programmes and even in News broadcasts where such placements are given a billing way beyond their importance - the Tories are correct the BBC can survive on adverts as it proves.

            Comment

            • Pianorak
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3127

              BBC Sounds, podcast, radio . . . As soon as I hear that I just switch off. Talk about overkill!
              My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)

              Comment

              • DracoM
                Host
                • Mar 2007
                • 12978

                Ditto. Wreckage of continuity - like applause between movements.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37710

                  Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
                  Actually I now listen less and less to R3, not only do we get 2mins minimum of trails per hour (obviously way to go to match the USA 10-12mins) with at least 1 after every program often squeezed in such that the dying chords of one piece are immediately succeeded by a jarring advert but there are now 'product placements' in many programmes and even in News broadcasts where such placements are given a billing way beyond their importance - the Tories are correct the BBC can survive on adverts as it proves.
                  On today's lunchtime BBC local TV news, they even had an item championing a couple of young guys making thousands of £££s by importing top price trainers from China and selling them on on the street. They were shown bragging about the amounts they were making, driving expensive motors, and saying they intended to continue as long as they were making money. I mean, there are often news items publicising art exhibitions or a new young singer making a name for herself, but this activity, the legality of which seemed highly questionable, went reported with no criticism or questioning at all by the reporter. I couldn't believe what I was seeing; what the hell is going on?.

                  Comment

                  • Frances_iom
                    Full Member
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 2413

                    Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                    Ditto. Wreckage of continuity - like applause between movements.
                    don't worry Bryn will soon be along to explain it is just a resurrected 18th C custom - actually I suspect the audience has a number of first time attendees at a concert, which is in itself a GOOD thing, but possibly the floor manager might have a few additional words of welcome as well as reminding them to switch their phones back on as they leave at the end of the concert.

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
                      don't worry Bryn will soon be along to explain it is just a resurrected 18th C custom - actually I suspect the audience has a number of first time attendees at a concert, which is in itself a GOOD thing, but possibly the floor manager might have a few additional words of welcome as well as reminding them to switch their phones back on as they leave at the end of the concert.
                      I find that if I am concentrating on the performance of the music, I do not feel a need to concentrate similarly on the approbation demonstrated between movements. Indeed, I find it far less distracting than the necessary retuning sometimes called for before proceeding to the next movement. Applause can even act to ameliorate the disruption engendered by such retuning.

                      Comment

                      • LMcD
                        Full Member
                        • Sep 2017
                        • 8489

                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        On today's lunchtime BBC local TV news, they even had an item championing a couple of young guys making thousands of £££s by importing top price trainers from China and selling them on on the street. They were shown bragging about the amounts they were making, driving expensive motors, and saying they intended to continue as long as they were making money. I mean, there are often news items publicising art exhibitions or a new young singer making a name for herself, but this activity, the legality of which seemed highly questionable, went reported with no criticism or questioning at all by the reporter. I couldn't believe what I was seeing; what the hell is going on?.
                        On Monday night, BBC 'Look East' chose as its main story, in the 7 or so minutes air-time at its disposal, the recollections of people who were briefly acquainted in their childhood with a recently deceased reality show presenter. What is 'going on' to an increasing extent is the BBC's increasingly desperate attempts to retain the few young(er) viewers it has managed to hold on to, and attract new ones. Hence, for example, the shortening of the 10.00 p.m. news on BBC1, which last night featured as a main story 'The Brits, in the hope that young(er) viewers will be attracted to programmes in the 'yoof strand'.

                        Comment

                        • Old Grumpy
                          Full Member
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 3619

                          Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                          On Monday night, BBC 'Look East' chose as its main story, in the 7 or so minutes air-time at its disposal, the recollections of people who were briefly acquainted in their childhood with a recently deceased reality show presenter. What is 'going on' to an increasing extent is the BBC's increasingly desperate attempts to retain the few young(er) viewers it has managed to hold on to, and attract new ones. Hence, for example, the shortening of the 10.00 p.m. news on BBC1, which last night featured as a main story 'The Brits, in the hope that young(er) viewers will be attracted to programmes in the 'yoof strand'.
                          Is there an Essex connection or somefin?

                          Sorry don't participate in "reality" (or TV much)!

                          OG

                          Comment

                          • LMcD
                            Full Member
                            • Sep 2017
                            • 8489

                            Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
                            Is there an Essex connection or somefin?

                            Sorry don't participate in "reality" (or TV much)!

                            OG
                            The little that I do know about 'reality' TV shows has come my way only because they, and their presenters, have come to be regarded as major stories and so find their way into news bulletins.

                            Comment

                            • Beresford
                              Full Member
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 555

                              If R3 becomes a subscription channel, I hope they will introduce, for a small additional sum, an automute that silences trails and any other adverts.

                              Technically Sky could do that now, but don't, because the advertisers call the shots.

                              Comment

                              • cloughie
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2011
                                • 22128

                                Originally posted by Beresford View Post
                                If R3 becomes a subscription channel, I hope they will introduce, for a small additional sum, an automute that silences trails and any other adverts.

                                Technically Sky could do that now, but don't, because the advertisers call the shots.
                                Well they can hardly bite off the hand that passes them the readies!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X