Christian rights cases go before Strasbourg court - a case of double standards?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • scottycelt

    Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
    I wasn't going to post again but I can assure you it wasn't intended as abuse but as an accurate description of your approach to this issue .

    As once was said "The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.

    That sums up your postings - no matter how often and how clearly the legal and employment position has been explained to you by numerous forum members .
    I am well aware of the legal and employment position. 'Numerous' forum members can rest assured on that point.

    The legal and employment position is currently that gays cannot marry (each other). You and some disapprove and want to change the law, even though others merely wish to retain the status quo.

    The legal and employment position is also that heterosexuals don't have the benefit of Civil Partnerships. These are exclusive to gays, and yet not a word about 'bigotry' and 'discrimination' from you and others here. There are no plans to change the law in this regard.

    Does that, therefore, not automatically make you 'a bigot' and guilty of outrageous 'discrimination' just like myself ... ?

    Comment

    • amateur51

      Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
      I am well aware of the legal and employment position. 'Numerous' forum members can rest assured on that point.

      The legal and employment position is currently that gays cannot marry (each other). You and some disapprove and want to change the law, even though others merely wish to retain the status quo.

      The legal and employment position is also that heterosexuals don't have the benefit of Civil Partnerships. These are exclusive to gays, and yet not a word about 'bigotry' and 'discrimination' from you and others here. There are no plans to change the law in this regard.

      Does that, therefore, not automatically make you 'a bigot' and guilty of outrageous 'discrimination' just like myself ... ?
      Have a care, Barbs - he's just played the last word game - do not get drawn into the whirlpool

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 11676

        Don't worry Ams - I have made my point and with every post he makes it much better than I could ever do

        Comment

        • scottycelt

          Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
          Have a care, Barbs - he's just played the last word game - do not get drawn into the whirlpool
          What I suspect you mean by your now time-honoured and wholly meaningless last word claim is that you're really rather stuck for any sort of meaningful response, whether you manage to get your posts in first or last or anywhere in between, amsey ...

          Comment

          • scottycelt

            Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
            Don't worry Ams - I have made my point and with every post he makes it much better than I could ever do
            I'm still not quite sure what your point is as you've never actually responded to my own (points).

            However, Ams 'n' Barbs are at one and that's all that matters!

            Comment

            • Flosshilde
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7988

              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
              I'm still not quite sure what your point is as you've never actually responded to my own (points).
              Do you have any point(s)?

              Comment

              • Flosshilde
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7988

                Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                , even though others merely wish to retain the status quo.
                No doubt you'd like to return to the status quo as it existed pre-1967

                Comment

                • scottycelt

                  Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                  Do you have any point(s)?
                  Yes, a visit to a leading optician might well be of some assistance to you here ... http://www.specsavers.co.uk/ ... but I agree that the points are rendered pretty useless anyway if these either are not grasped or are deliberately ignored by others with their own pet little agendas.

                  Comment

                  • scottycelt

                    Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                    No doubt you'd like to return to the status quo as it existed pre-1967
                    Wrong again, Flossie ... go to the bottom of the class!

                    1967 was the best year of my life.

                    Comment

                    • amateur51

                      Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                      Wrong again, Flossie ... go to the bottom of the class!

                      1967 was the best year of my life.
                      Nuff said

                      Comment

                      • scottycelt

                        Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                        Nuff said

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37644

                          Originally posted by scottycelt View Post

                          1967 was the best year of my life.
                          You attended the Dialectics of Liberation Congress at the Roundhouse too, then?

                          Comment

                          • Ferretfancy
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3487

                            Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                            Wrong again, Flossie ... go to the bottom of the class!

                            1967 was the best year of my life.
                            That must have been because Harold Wilson allowed Leo Abse to introduce the bill de-criminalising homosexuality. You surprise me sometimes, Scotty !

                            Comment

                            • amateur51

                              Originally posted by Ferretfancy View Post
                              That must have been because Harold Wilson allowed Leo Abse to introduce the bill de-criminalising homosexuality. You surprise me sometimes, Scotty !

                              Comment

                              • Flosshilde
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 7988

                                Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                                their own pet little agendas.
                                As opposed to the Pope's pet agenda

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X