HoLords reform hits the skids

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30650

    Originally posted by french frank View Post
    So, the really Big Question in my mind is: after three Labour terms in office, most of it with a huge Commons majority, why didn't they - or why couldn't they - make a difference in those people's lives?
    Originally posted by LHC View Post
    They did; they made them far more dependent on state benefits than ever before.
    I don't think that that's an answer to my question at all.

    Progressive Third World charities know that the answer to global poverty isn't giving people money. It's providing them with the means of supporting themselves. In this country it principally means providing decent jobs and equipping/educating people to do them.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • LHC
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1576

      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      I don't think that that's an answer to my question at all.

      Progressive Third World charities know that the answer to global poverty isn't giving people money. It's providing them with the means of supporting themselves. In this country it principally means providing decent jobs and equipping/educating people to do them.
      I agree completely, which is why its disappointing that the last Government chose to give people money instead of providing them with the means of supporting themselves.
      "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
      Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        The fairest thing is for each MP to represent roughly the same number of constituents.
        surely its time for them to stop pretending that they actually "represent" anyone except
        1: Their party
        2: Their mates
        3: Their "career"
        and in a very poor 4th place

        their constituents

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
          surely its time for them to stop pretending that they actually "represent" anyone except
          1: Their party
          2: Their mates
          3: Their "career"
          and in a very poor 4th place

          their constituents

          Sorry MrGG, I cannot agree. Surely 4 is their future trough-nosing 'job' opportunities. Such considerations come well before representing their constituents.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30650

            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
            surely its time for them to stop pretending that they actually "represent" anyone except
            1: Their party
            2: Their mates
            3: Their "career"
            and in a very poor 4th place

            their constituents

            That may have some relevance during campaigning in an election - some way of indicating what you 'stand for'.

            Once elected, the MP is there to serve all constituents, and if they have individual problems the MP will act for them. I know this is true of MPs of ALL parties. And most constituents are individuals with individual problems, and are not politically motivated.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • MrGongGong
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 18357

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              That may have some relevance during campaigning in an election - some way of indicating what you 'stand for'.


              you mean like a "pledge" of your beliefs then ?

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37993

                Originally posted by JohnSkelton View Post
                Them.
                Mind if I photocopy this, John? Makes for nice psychedelic wallpaper!

                Comment

                • JohnSkelton

                  Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                  Mind if I photocopy this, John? Makes for nice psychedelic wallpaper!
                  Be my guest (Please enjoy psychedelic wallpapers responsibly. For more information visit the Enjoy Psychedelic Wallpapers Responsibly website).

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37993

                    Originally posted by JohnSkelton View Post
                    Be my guest (Please enjoy psychedelic wallpapers responsibly. For more information visit the Enjoy Psychedelic Wallpapers Responsibly website).

                    Comment

                    • JohnSkelton

                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      The fact that in strongly Tory areas the turnout is still high. In strong Labour areas it tends to be low. The rest is my speculative explanation
                      A speculative explanation based on the belief that the bourgeoisie are possessed of a sense of "civic duty" but the lower orders are not?

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30650

                        Originally posted by JohnSkelton View Post
                        A speculative explanation based on the belief that the bourgeoisie are possessed of a sense of "civic duty" but the lower orders are not?
                        No. Based on decades of knocking on doors canvassing and hearing what voters have to say

                        The best reply:

                        "I'm not really political"

                        "Does that mean you won't be voting?"

                        "Oh, yes, I always vote [Tory]."
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          No. Based on decades of knocking on doors canvassing and hearing what voters have to say

                          The best reply:

                          "I'm not really political"

                          "Does that mean you won't be voting?"

                          "Oh, yes, I always vote [Tory]."
                          "Now then Terry, don't be telling porkie pies to the nice lady"

                          Comment

                          • JohnSkelton

                            Originally posted by french frank View Post
                            The best reply:

                            "I'm not really political"

                            "Oh, yes, I always vote [Tory].
                            I say that to anyone who knocks on the door - to read the electric, Jehovah's Witness, what's her name's brother. Never fails to confuse them.

                            Comment

                            • amateur51

                              Originally posted by JohnSkelton View Post
                              I say that to anyone who knocks on the door - to read the electric, Jehovah's Witness, what's her name's brother. Never fails to confuse them.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30650

                                I was told recently that political 'tribalism' was dying out and voters were much more uncertain as to who they would vote for.

                                But back in my day () things were less complicated. I was told to visit my father's cousin and 'solicit his support' - as I was the candidate. "Oh, I'm sorry, but I'm a member of the Conservative [social] club so I really have to vote Conservative.'

                                Knocking on the door of a family for whom (as a prospective candidate) I'd done a lot of work during the course of the year. 'Can I count on your support in the election.' 'Oooh, no, I'm afraid we're all Conservatives.' [Thinks: why didn't you ask the Tory to help you then?]

                                And I could give worse examples ...
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X