Higgs' Boson? - We Have A Discovery

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aka Calum Da Jazbo
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 9173

    Originally posted by Oddball View Post
    The Grand Synthesis?
    there are videos here presenting for over an hour in front of a room full of testosterone fuelled American male academics who are mostly finding her hard to follow and she gives a virtuoso performance of knocking them back on their heels .... she really has thought it through and knows the stuff ... she was briefly featured on a Horizon prog about this kind of thing

    Mersini-Houghton has worked on a variety of topics on the particle physics-cosmology interface. She was particularly interested in the possibility of generating dark energy from transplanckian physics in string theory, gravity and quantum field theory in curved space, and higher-dimension braneworlds.

    One of her major contributions is her theory that explains the selection of the Initial Conditions of our Universe from the multiverse.[2][3] This theory explains that the only way the universe can survive the Big Bang is if it bangs at high energies. As such, high energy initial states for the universe are more probable than their low energy initial patches, since the latter are terminal. This theory addresses one of the big mysteries of nature, the birth of the low entropy universe in compliance with the arrow of time. It also offers observational signatures of all the surviving universes that comprise the multiverse. She says that when it comes to what we know about the universe, current physics theory is lagging a little behind. For example, the Big Bang theory might not be enough to explain the origin of all the matter in the universe (everything from the universe's large-scale structure – galaxies and the like – to cosmic microwave background radiation, dark matter, and the rest). A Copernican extension of our physical theories to a multiverse framework may be required for probing the most fundamental questions and best kept secrets of nature.

    In 2006, Mersini-Houghton with collaborators predicted a series of observational imprints of her theory [4] for the birth of our high-energy universe from the multiverse, by using the unitarity principle of quantum mechanics (no information loss). They predicted the existence of a giant void far away of size about 12 degrees in the southern hemisphere of the sky; the 'tilting' of the gravitational potential in the universe, which gives rise to a Dark Flow of structure, caused by superhorizon entanglement of our universe with all else in the multiverse; the suppression of the overall amplitude of inflationary fluctuations due to the same interaction of our Hubble volume with others in the multiverse, etc. A second void was predicted for the northern hemisphere of the sky as reported in the New Scientist.[5]

    In 2007, Mersini-Houghton claimed that the observed CMB cold spot was "the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own",[6] just as she and her collaborator had predicted in her theory 8 months earlier.[7]

    In November 2008, a NASA team led by Alexander Kashlinsky[8] observed the Dark Flow of galaxy clusters in the universe at exactly the velocity and alignment predicted by her [9] earlier in the 'Cosmological Avatars of the Landscape I, II' papers in 2006.[4]

    In the same year (2006) WMAP reached agreement with SDSS experiment, that the overall amplitude of fluctuation is less than 1. If these observational findings, predicted in the 2006 papers by Mersini-Houghton et al. are confirmed over the next few years, then they may offer the first evidence of a world beyond our own. Such confirmation would tie the standard model of cosmology into a more coherent picture where our universe is not at the center of the world, but part of it.[citation needed]

    After the observational confirmation of the three predictions (the Void, Dark Flow and Sigma8) her work continues to attract international media attention, GCHEP/UNC, and Discover magazine, October 2009.

    Two astrophysicists reported recently that they have found evidence of the northern hemisphere void in analysis of WMAP data.[10]
    wicki
    According to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.

    Comment

    • Gordon
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 1425

      Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
      The video interview with Lawrence Krauss is very good.
      Thanks Pab, it is good. There is another similarly entertaining and lively interview with Brian Greene that explores broader territory - including the multiverse [is "multiverse" plural or singular?!?] - in a similar way and with no maths. There's an audience Q&A afterwards. Well worth a listen if you have 80 minutes! Beats washing up.

      Brian Greene, PhD, professor of physics and mathematics at Columbia University and bestselling author known for his groundbreaking discoveries in the field o...


      Still mulling over the David Deutsch lectures on QC. They do involve a fair amount of maths but not overwhelmingly so. If you have smattering of calculus and matrix theory then they'll be OK.

      Comment

      • Gordon
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 1425

        #166

        Thanks CDJ. Marvellous video of this phenomenal lady!! This para of your quote:

        [QUOTE]In 2006, Mersini-Houghton with collaborators predicted a series of observational imprints of her theory [4] for the birth of our high-energy universe from the multiverse, by using the unitarity principle of quantum mechanics (no information loss). They predicted the existence of a giant void far away of size about 12 degrees in the southern hemisphere of the sky; the 'tilting' of the gravitational potential in the universe, which gives rise to a Dark Flow of structure, caused by superhorizon entanglement of our universe with all else in the multiverse; the suppression of the overall amplitude of inflationary fluctuations due to the same interaction of our Hubble volume with others in the multiverse, etc. A second void was predicted for the northern hemisphere of the sky as reported in the New Scientist.[5][/QUOTE]

        This stuff sounds like a suggestion of interaction at the edge of our "Hubble Bubble" that is discussed in the Brian Greene interview linked in my previous post.

        Comment

        • Gordon
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 1425

          Well,as usually happens, this looks like the end for this thread. Pity as this one was just getting going! I learned a lot so thanks to all who have responded, especially VC who put me right on a couple of things!! Might get a few chores done now!

          Comment

          • umslopogaas
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 1977

            Well, having contributed half a book to this thread, I'm not going to let it die and will continue to bring it back to life, even though at the moment I cant think of anything else useful to say.

            Comment

            • Quarky
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 2672

              Originally posted by Gordon View Post
              Well,as usually happens, this looks like the end for this thread. Pity as this one was just getting going! I learned a lot so thanks to all who have responded, especially VC who put me right on a couple of things!! Might get a few chores done now!
              Same here Gordon! Had to pull myself off David Deutsch's lectures temporarily - got to earn a living!

              Spent some time on Lecture 1, and correlating his terminology with Dirac's terminology - just happened to have a copy of Dirac's book on my bookshelf.

              Stunning experiment in Lecture 2 with interference of single photons, showing remarkably how a photon "remembers" its other half. However he might have developed this to show two photon entanglement - at least i don't think he did.

              Must go over lecture 3 again, and this time, no wavering of concentration - no getting up for a cup of coffee!

              Lecture 4 - Schroedinger representation - thought that was the easy version of QM! At least I know now that if I exist in a parallel universe, i am not a lecturer in QM!

              Eventually got someplace by surfing recent experimental papers - regretfully had to put David Deutsch to one side - I was getting depressed.
              Last edited by Quarky; 23-07-12, 15:13.

              Comment

              Working...
              X