Originally posted by Serial_Apologist
View Post
The Shard: scintillating or a scar?
Collapse
X
-
Anna
-
Northender
Originally posted by Anna View PostFirstly, I've only seen the Shard in photographs so maybe I shouldn't comment. Personally I like the Eiffel Tower but you cannot compare that to the Shard except comparison of height and the Tower is, I think, quite elegant in that it tapers away into almost nothing but straddles Paris in a totally non-threatening way.
The Shard (to me) just seems a very vulgar ostentatious display of wealth which would be fine if sited in Dubai, but it's not in Dubai, it's in London and it seems to be looking down on St. Pauls and saying 'well, you didn't kick the moneylenders out of the Temple did you?' In fact, should it be renamed Barclays Tower? Which, having just seen S_A's post it seems he thinks the same.
Well said, Anna! May I suggest 'Mammon Monster' as an alternative name?
Comment
-
Personally I like the Eiffel Tower but you cannot compare that to the Shard except comparison of height and the Tower is, I think, quite elegant in that it tapers away into almost nothing but straddles Paris in a totally non-threatening way.
is that because it's been there a long time ?
one could say that it "straddles" the city in a stance of dominance ? (where is Susan Sontag when you need her ?)
what about the Tokyo tower ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View Post
& la Scheggia doesn't sound quite so aggressive as 'The Shard'.
Comment
-
-
Northender
I've seen the Shard a couple of times when in London for the day - it doesn't so much emerge quietly from its surroundings as thrust itself, shouting, at you. If it was a piece of music it would be something by Harrison Birtwotsisname.
Comment
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostBut is your opinion of the ET swayed by your liking it? It could equally well be called a monstrosity that squats by the Seinne (spelling?) and looms over Paris, with no grace or style. The Shard, by comparison, is a gleaming, elegant needle, pointing to the sky. The 'vulgar, ostentatious display of wealth' is not intrinsic to the building, but a subjective view, coloured by knowledge of its owners & the accomodation in it. If it consisted of 'social housing' (unlikely, I know, but not, in other political circumstances, impossible), or even 'ordinary' offices, then would it still be a vulgar display of wealth?
Comment
-
Dear Mercia
I hated the Shard because it was an invasion of the South side of the river by The City and its gimmicky shape irritated me. I still resent the invasion but seeing the thing in its completed state I have to admit it has an imposing presence and adds an air of fantasy in the mundane context of London Bridge, otherwise devoted to scurrying commuters.
G
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View Post[Mind you the views from the top must be fantastic]. I wonder from what furthest distance it can be seen.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostDear Mercia
I hated the Shard because it was an invasion of the South side of the river by The City and its gimmicky shape irritated me. I still resent the invasion but seeing the thing in its completed state I have to admit it has an imposing presence and adds an air of fantasy in the mundane context of London Bridge, otherwise devoted to scurrying commuters.
G
I was struck by the huge upside down breast that someone seems to have placed on the cathedral
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AmpH View PostIndeed the views are fantastic .... especially at night. Have a look at this ..... amazing pics !
http://www.placehacking.co.uk/2012/0...g-shard-glass/
Eeeeeeek!!!! You could have given a warning for those of a (very) nervous disposition. Once I'd started to look I couldn't look away
Comment
-
Comment