Barclays: A page to be updated

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lateralthinking1

    #31
    Originally posted by PJPJ View Post
    Hardly surprising - it is surely easier for an Opposition to make knee-jerk demands and get away with them should they be shown later to be ridiculous. Those in Government need to be a little more careful, look at the evidence and take good advice.

    When Labour was in power, they were accused similarly of dragging feet, and if they didn't, of acting impulsively.
    Spot on PJPJ. Each party has been going through the motions as one would expect in their Government and Opposition roles.

    (The Lib Dems are doing their creative midfield thing rather than their staunch coalition thing but it isn't a radical, what the hell are they up to, dangerous thinking outside the box).

    Talking of what the hell are they up to, does anyone believe for one moment that key Libor procedure was communicated in a series of muffled phone calls? I don't.

    I would have imagined about 23 meetings, some involving 'standard setting' non-executive directors, another lot monitoring them, and a further bunch with external worthies being paid to monitor the first set of monitors. Nothing put in writing obviously.
    Last edited by Guest; 03-07-12, 16:18.

    Comment

    • eighthobstruction
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 6433

      #32
      While Labour obviously has a great deal of soul searching to do ref the regulatory frameworks that were set during their time....one would imagine that ALL these executives who have actually breached the regulations and manipulated these interest rates were; no doubt, unlikely to be Labour card carriers or voters....

      Seeing Govt and Treasury ministers and Bank of England have known about this since 2008....why has it taken 4 years to hit the headlines....
      bong ching

      Comment

      • scottycelt

        #33
        Marcus Agius has just been interviewed on Sky News and looked and sounded utterly shell-shocked.

        He didn't exactly come across as the man to sort out the shambles in Barclays.

        Very worrying times for shareholders and the many thousands of bank staff, I suspect.

        Comment

        • teamsaint
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 25204

          #34
          Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
          While Labour obviously has a great deal of soul searching to do ref the regulatory frameworks that were set during their time....one would imagine that ALL these executives who have actually breached the regulations and manipulated these interest rates were; no doubt, unlikely to be Labour card carriers or voters....

          Seeing Govt and Treasury ministers and Bank of England have known about this since 2008....why has it taken 4 years to hit the headlines....
          because the politicians and bankers are all in it together.

          The "socialists " (ha ha) as much as the others.

          It stinks.
          I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

          I am not a number, I am a free man.

          Comment

          • amateur51

            #35
            Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
            because the politicians and bankers are all in it together.

            The "socialists " (ha ha) as much as the others.

            It stinks.
            Mervyn King has been very quiet - neither a weather forecast nor news from the helm for ages

            Comment

            • teamsaint
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 25204

              #36
              Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
              Mervyn King has been very quiet - neither a weather forecast nor news from the helm for ages
              you know, I never thought merv being quiet would be a bad thing...........
              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

              I am not a number, I am a free man.

              Comment

              • Lateralthinking1

                #37
                Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                Marcus Agius has just been interviewed on Sky News and looked and sounded utterly shell-shocked.
                He won't be able any longer to do an effective job at the BBC then. No need to get rid there but best limit his remit to drama.

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View Post
                  He won't be able any longer to do an effective job at the BBC then. No need to get rid there but best limit his remit to drama.
                  Cheeky!

                  Comment

                  • subcontrabass
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 2780

                    #39
                    Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                    you know, I never thought merv being quiet would be a bad thing...........
                    Apparently Diamond's departure was a result of an "inflexion of his [King's] eyebrows" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18690102)

                    Comment

                    • Lateralthinking1

                      #40
                      Originally posted by subcontrabass View Post
                      Apparently Diamond's departure was a result of an "inflexion of his [King's] eyebrows" (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18690102)
                      Well, it was impossible for it to be done by the sheer force of King's personality.



                      Robert Peston - 'It's a jungle out there'
                      Last edited by Guest; 03-07-12, 19:43.

                      Comment

                      • Osborn

                        #41
                        Did these inflected eyebrows manifest themselves to Diamond or his colleagues by phone or post?

                        Comment

                        • subcontrabass
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 2780

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Osborn View Post
                          Did these inflected eyebrows manifest themselves to Diamond or his colleagues by phone or post?
                          Apparently via a phone call to the chairman.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30263

                            #43
                            Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                            Marcus Agius has just been interviewed on Sky News and looked and sounded utterly shell-shocked.
                            No wonder. He resigns one day, he's running the entire show on his own the next.

                            What I wonder is - what does the 'senior non-executive Director' of the BBC do that's worth £47,000 p.a. of licence fee payers' money? It may be peanuts in the banking world, but it would be quite a lot for attending a meeting now and again in a non-executive capacity.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • An_Inspector_Calls

                              #44
                              Well if you don't know what the role of a non-executive director of a large organization such as the BBC is, then why are you senior member of Friends of Radio 3? And as for the £47,000, I'm quite surprised he gets out of bed for so little.
                              Last edited by Guest; 03-07-12, 19:10. Reason: spelling

                              Comment

                              • scottycelt

                                #45
                                I often wonder what any non-executive director of any company does, apart from sitting in at board meetings and occasionally butting-in and informing the executive directors of how well he/she and her other directors do things in his/her main job/company, even if the two (companies) are not even remotely connected.

                                But there you go, that's pure cynicism (and probably total ignorance) for you ...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X